From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752396AbcLGMbp (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2016 07:31:45 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:33984 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752094AbcLGMbn (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2016 07:31:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 13:31:40 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Lino Sanfilippo Cc: Giuseppe CAVALLARO , alexandre.torgue@st.com, David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC] Re: Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Message-ID: <20161207123140.GA8785@amd> References: <20161123105125.GA26394@amd> <20161124085506.GA25007@amd> <20161124.110416.198867271899443489.davem@davemloft.net> <20161124212540.GA24796@amd> <20161202084511.GA32294@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri 2016-12-02 15:05:21, Lino Sanfilippo wrote: > Hi, >=20 >=20 > >=20 > > There's nothing that protect stmmac_poll() from running concurently > > with stmmac_dma_interrupt(), right? > >=20 >=20 > could it be that there is also another issue concerned locking?: > The tx completion handler takes the xmit_lock in case that the > netif_queue is stopped. This is AFAICS unnecessary, since both > xmit and completion handler are already synchronized by the private > tx lock. But it is IMHO also dangerous: >=20 > In the xmit handler we have the locking order > 1. xmit_lock > 2. private tx lock >=20 > while in the completion handler its the reverse: >=20 > 1. private tx lock > 2. xmit lock. >=20 > Do I miss something? No, it seems you are right. Something like this? Hmm. And can priv->tx_lock be removed, as we already rely on netif_tx_lock? (I copied the "lock already held" annotations from forcedeth. I hope they are right....) Best regards, Pavel commit a6f21255dfc11fcadc5062dfd0c5f3d77ca4f634 Author: Pavel Date: Wed Dec 7 13:29:15 2016 +0100 Reported-by: Lino Sanfilippo =20 The tx completion handler takes the xmit_lock in case that the netif_queue is stopped. This is AFAICS unnecessary, since both xmit and completion handler are already synchronized by the private tx lock. But it is IMHO also dangerous: =20 In the xmit handler we have the locking order 1. xmit_lock 2. private tx lock =20 while in the completion handler its the reverse: =20 1. private tx lock 2. xmit lock. =20 Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/ne= t/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c index 982c952..5df9bb3 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c @@ -1380,14 +1380,9 @@ static void stmmac_tx_clean(struct stmmac_priv *priv) =20 if (unlikely(netif_queue_stopped(priv->dev) && stmmac_tx_avail(priv) > STMMAC_TX_THRESH)) { - netif_tx_lock(priv->dev); - if (netif_queue_stopped(priv->dev) && - stmmac_tx_avail(priv) > STMMAC_TX_THRESH) { - netif_dbg(priv, tx_done, priv->dev, - "%s: restart transmit\n", __func__); - netif_wake_queue(priv->dev); - } - netif_tx_unlock(priv->dev); + netif_dbg(priv, tx_done, priv->dev, + "%s: restart transmit\n", __func__); + netif_wake_queue(priv->dev); } =20 if ((priv->eee_enabled) && (!priv->tx_path_in_lpi_mode)) { @@ -1630,7 +1625,9 @@ static void stmmac_tx_timer(unsigned long data) { struct stmmac_priv *priv =3D (struct stmmac_priv *)data; =20 + netif_tx_lock_bh(priv->dev); stmmac_tx_clean(priv); + netif_tx_unlock_bh(priv->dev); } =20 /** @@ -1994,7 +1991,8 @@ static void stmmac_tso_allocator(struct stmmac_priv *= priv, unsigned int des, * -------- * * mss is fixed when enable tso, so w/o programming the TDES3 ctx field. - */ + * + * Called with netif_tx_lock held. = */ static netdev_tx_t stmmac_tso_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device = *dev) { u32 pay_len, mss; @@ -2174,6 +2172,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t stmmac_tso_xmit(struct sk_buff *sk= b, struct net_device *dev) * Description : this is the tx entry point of the driver. * It programs the chain or the ring and supports oversized frames * and SG feature. + * Called with netif_tx_lock held.=20 */ static netdev_tx_t stmmac_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) { @@ -2684,7 +2683,9 @@ static int stmmac_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int = budget) int work_done =3D 0; =20 priv->xstats.napi_poll++; + netif_tx_lock_bh(priv->dev); stmmac_tx_clean(priv); + netif_tx_unlock_bh(priv->dev); =20 work_done =3D stmmac_rx(priv, budget); if (work_done < budget) { @@ -2701,6 +2702,7 @@ static int stmmac_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int = budget) * complete within a reasonable time. The driver will mark the error in = the * netdev structure and arrange for the device to be reset to a sane sta= te * in order to transmit a new packet. + * Called with netif_tx_lock held. */ static void stmmac_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev) { --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlhIASwACgkQMOfwapXb+vLB/gCgkLA1yrUoaU8Ff60+xtiZBLZw 8c0AnjZqLROhrNx9aZfNGb0VVXiDr8pl =Vw/x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9--