From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with Linus' tree
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 10:44:09 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161209104409.1f64df16@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
Hi Bjorn,
Today's linux-next merge of the pci tree got a conflict in:
drivers/pci/msi.c
between commit:
62c61514191b ("doc: Add missing parameter for msi_setup")
from Linus' tree and commit:
67f1e4473857 ("PCI/MSI: Document new parameter for msi_capability_init()")
from the pci tree.
I fixed it up (I just used the pci tree version) and can carry the fix
as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but
any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
next reply other threads:[~2016-12-08 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-08 23:44 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-13 23:45 linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 5:48 ` Sergio Paracuellos
2022-01-14 6:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 6:57 ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-08-25 0:57 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-23 0:19 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-14 1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-30 23:49 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-31 8:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-03-24 23:58 Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-19 12:33 Mark Brown
2018-07-20 1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-20 9:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-07-20 10:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-04-03 2:29 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-26 1:23 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-27 16:19 ` Rob Herring
2017-06-26 0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-03 2:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-23 1:44 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-23 16:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-20 23:33 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17 1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-04 1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-04 2:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-04 2:04 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-04 1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-04 6:57 ` Yuval Mintz
2012-06-25 2:31 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-25 6:32 ` huang ying
2012-06-25 14:14 ` Alan Stern
2012-06-19 1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-20 2:08 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-07 0:25 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-07 0:25 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-14 0:05 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-14 0:38 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-10-14 2:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-14 7:41 ` David Woodhouse
2009-06-30 1:56 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-30 2:01 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-06-30 2:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-06-30 16:00 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161209104409.1f64df16@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).