From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933397AbcLIOqF (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 09:46:05 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:48819 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750881AbcLIOqE (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 09:46:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 15:45:51 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Tim Chen , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@suse.de, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, jolsa@redhat.com, Srinivas Pandruvada Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 8/8] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use CPPC to get max performance Message-ID: <20161209144551.jhnbfsxdxsk4ld6s@linutronix.de> References: <20161207190608.boi7svavwrkx3epm@breakpoint.cc> <1481152373.3064.77.camel@linux.intel.com> <4248602.ecJ9y5gJMR@aspire.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4248602.ecJ9y5gJMR@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161126 (1.7.1) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2016-12-08 00:29:29 [+0100], Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Agreed, but the bug fixed by the first hunk is real too. I'd fix it a bit > differently, though: > > Tentatively-signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Is there anything you want me to do here? The hunk in acpi_cppc_processor_exit() is unchanged and is the one that led to the crash. The other hunk I made (the one you changed) was something I noticed while looking at the code - nothing that hit me directly. Sebastian