linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1568 at kernel/sched/core.c:7738 __might_sleep+0x69/0x7e
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:03:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161212220349.GK13864@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161209151229.GD4334@dhcp22.suse.cz>

Hello, Michal.

On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 04:12:29PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
> I am seeing the following warning during boot in my kvm testing
> environment:
> [    3.549649] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1568 at kernel/sched/core.c:7738 __might_sleep+0x69/0x7e
> [    3.551279] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=2 set at [<ffffffff81098621>] prepare_to_wait+0x65/0xac
> [    3.553354] Modules linked in:
> [    3.554032] CPU: 3 PID: 1568 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 4.9.0-rc8-nofstest5-next-20161209-00013-g3134766e941a #1018
> [    3.556099] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-20161025_171302-gandalf 04/01/2014
> [    3.557330] Call Trace:
> [    3.557330]  dump_stack+0x68/0x92
> [    3.557330]  __warn+0xc2/0xdd
> [    3.557330]  warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4b/0x53
> [    3.557330]  ? prepare_to_wait+0x65/0xac
> [    3.557330]  ? prepare_to_wait+0x65/0xac
> [    3.557330]  __might_sleep+0x69/0x7e
> [    3.557330]  do_ide_request+0x47/0x540
> [    3.557330]  ? __lock_is_held+0x47/0x7a
> [    3.557330]  ? hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x15f/0x1c6
> [    3.557330]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x61
> [    3.557330]  __blk_run_queue+0x31/0x3a
> [    3.557330]  cfq_insert_request+0x331/0x429
> [    3.557330]  __elv_add_request+0x2bb/0x346
> [    3.557330]  blk_flush_plug_list+0x1da/0x21f
> [    3.557330]  ? bit_wait+0x50/0x50
> [    3.557330]  io_schedule_timeout+0x47/0x102
> [    3.557330]  bit_wait_io+0x1b/0x5a
> [    3.557330]  __wait_on_bit+0x4d/0x7b
> [    3.557330]  out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x72/0x7d
> [    3.557330]  ? bit_wait+0x50/0x50
> [    3.557330]  ? autoremove_wake_function+0x4e/0x4e
> [    3.557330]  __wait_on_buffer+0x40/0x43
> [    3.557330]  bh_submit_read+0x60/0x72
> [    3.557330]  ext4_get_branch+0x91/0x115
> [    3.557330]  ext4_ind_map_blocks+0x181/0xa16
> [    3.557330]  ? __lock_is_held+0x47/0x7a
> [    3.557330]  ? lock_acquire+0x133/0x1c7
> [    3.557330]  ext4_map_blocks+0x120/0x4ca
> [    3.557330]  ext4_mpage_readpages+0x2a7/0x70a
> [    3.557330]  ext4_readpages+0x33/0x35
> [    3.557330]  __do_page_cache_readahead+0x239/0x32a
> [    3.557330]  filemap_fault+0x180/0x602
> [    3.557330]  ? filemap_fault+0x180/0x602
> [    3.557330]  ext4_filemap_fault+0x37/0x4b
> [    3.557330]  __do_fault+0x1f/0x94
> [    3.557330]  handle_mm_fault+0x946/0xfca
> [    3.557330]  __do_page_fault+0x361/0x518
> [    3.557330]  do_page_fault+0x42/0x5f
> [    3.557330]  page_fault+0x22/0x30
> 
> At first I thought this would be related to you recent work
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1477673892-28940-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
> but that doesn't seem to be in the linux-next I am using as a base.
> io_schedule_timeout is on the stack though so you might have an idea
> what is going on here. That might_sleep check has been added a long ago
> 02e7cf8f8488 ("ide-cd,atapi: use bio for internal commands") in 2.6.31
> so I am wondering what has changed since than.

10d784eae2b4 ("sched: always use blk_schedule_flush_plug in
io_schedule_out") seems related.  might_sleep is complaining that it's
being called while !TASK_RUNNING.  Shaohua, any ideas?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-12 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-09 15:12 WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1568 at kernel/sched/core.c:7738 __might_sleep+0x69/0x7e Michal Hocko
2016-12-12 22:03 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-12-12 22:30   ` Cong Wang
2016-12-12 22:45   ` Shaohua Li
2016-12-21 10:47     ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-21 19:24       ` Cong Wang
2016-12-21 20:57         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161212220349.GK13864@htj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).