linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: shift by 1UL rather than 1 to fix sign extension error
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:06:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161214010633.GH9728@tardis.cn.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0jBu8ackxPrOALVnx96FSyD_-sZAAMySikqYw2uf8LEezr9g@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3186 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 02:09:27AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> 2016年12月14日 上午1:17,"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>写道:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:56:46AM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > >
> > > mask and bit are unsigned longs, so if bit is 31 we end up sign
> > > extending the 1 and mask ends up as 0xffffffff80000000. Fix this
> > > by explicitly adding integer suffix UL ensure 1 is a unsigned long
> > > rather than an signed int.
> > >
> > > Issue found with static analysis with CoverityScan, CID 1388564
> > >
> > > Fixes: 8965c3ce4718754db ("rcu: Use
> leaf_node_for_each_mask_possible_cpu() in force_qs_rnp()")
> > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > index 10162ac..6ecedd8 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > @@ -3051,7 +3051,7 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
> > >
> > >               leaf_node_for_each_mask_possible_cpu(rnp, rnp->qsmask,
> bit, cpu)
> > >                       if (f(per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu), isidle, maxj))
> > > -                             mask |= 1 << bit;
> > > +                             mask |= 1UL << bit;
> >
> > So as to match the rest of the code altered in commit bc75e99983df1efd
> > ("rcu: Correctly handle sparse possible cpus"), and regardless of
> > naming, I think it'd be nicer to use leaf_node_cpu_bit(), e.g.
> >
> >         leaf_node_for_each_mask_possible_cpu(rnp, rnp->qsmask, bit, cpu)
> >                 if (f(per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu), isidle, maxj))
> >                         mask |= leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu);
> >
> > IMO, it would be nice to hide the iterator bit somehow, to match
> > for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(), which this largely looks similar to
> > otherwise.
> >
> 
> Good point. ;-)
> 
> We can
> 
> #define for_each_leaf_node_cpu(rnp, mask, cpu) \
>         for((cpu) = (rnp)->grplo + find _first_bit(mask, MASK_BITS(mask)); \
>             (cpu) >= (rnp)->grplo && (cpu) <= (rnp)->grphi; \
>             (cpu) = (rnp)->grplo + find _next_bit(mask, ...,
> leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu) + 1))) \

Oops, this part is wrong..

>                 if (!cpu_possible(cpu)) \
>                         continue; \
>                 else
> 

Fixed version:

/*
 * Iterate over all possible CPUs a leaf RCU node which are still masked in
 * @mask.
 *
 * Note @rnp has to be a leaf node and @mask has to belong to @rnp.
 */
#define for_each_leaf_node_cpu(rnp, mask, cpu) \
	for ((cpu) = (rnp)->grplo + find_first_bit(&(mask), MASK_BITS(mask)); \
	     (cpu) >= (rnp)->grplo && (cpu) <= (rnp)->grphi; \
	     (cpu) = (rnp)->grplo + find_next_bit(&(mask), MASK_BITS(mask), \
						  (cpu) - (rnp)->grplo + 1)) \
		if (!cpu_possible(cpu)) \
			continue; \
		else

Regards,
Boqun

> Typing from my cellphone, plz ignore the bad formatting ;-)
> 
> Regards,
> Boqun
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Mark.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-14  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-13 10:56 [PATCH] rcu: shift by 1UL rather than 1 to fix sign extension error Colin King
2016-12-13 11:21 ` Boqun Feng
2016-12-13 11:33   ` Colin Ian King
2016-12-13 15:00     ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-12-14 14:42     ` Boqun Feng
2016-12-14 14:54       ` Colin Ian King
2016-12-13 12:25   ` Boqun Feng
2016-12-13 15:05     ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-12-13 17:16 ` Mark Rutland
     [not found]   ` <CAL0jBu8ackxPrOALVnx96FSyD_-sZAAMySikqYw2uf8LEezr9g@mail.gmail.com>
2016-12-13 18:36     ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-12-14  0:47       ` Boqun Feng
2016-12-14  1:40         ` Boqun Feng
2016-12-14  4:13           ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-12-14 10:55           ` Mark Rutland
2016-12-14 13:03             ` Boqun Feng
2016-12-14  1:06     ` Boqun Feng [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161214010633.GH9728@tardis.cn.ibm.com \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).