From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: kys@microsoft.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: move hyperv CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD from crashed kernel to kdump kernel
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:36:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161215103609.GB6336@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161215103402.GA6336@aepfle.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 735 bytes --]
On Thu, Dec 15, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> > I see a number of minor but at least one major issue against such move:
> > At least for some Hyper-V versions (2012R2 for example)
> > CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE is delivered to the CPU which initially sent
> > CHANNELMSG_REQUESTOFFERS and on kdump we may not have this CPU up as
> > we usually do kdump with nr_cpus=1 (and on the CPU which crashed).
>
> Since the kdump or kexec kernel will send the unload during boot I would
> expect the response to arrive where it was sent, independent from the
> number of cpus.
Wait, I just noticed that "REQUESTOFFERS" now. That might be a reason
why my suggestion will not work.
Olaf
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-15 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-07 8:51 move hyperv CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD from crashed kernel to kdump kernel Olaf Hering
2016-12-07 15:04 ` KY Srinivasan
2016-12-07 15:46 ` Olaf Hering
2016-12-07 16:10 ` KY Srinivasan
2016-12-07 16:19 ` Olaf Hering
2016-12-07 16:24 ` KY Srinivasan
2016-12-07 16:39 ` Olaf Hering
2016-12-07 18:11 ` KY Srinivasan
2016-12-15 10:26 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-12-15 10:34 ` Olaf Hering
2016-12-15 10:36 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2016-12-15 10:54 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-12-15 10:54 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-12-15 12:51 ` Olaf Hering
2016-12-15 13:28 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-12-15 13:51 ` Olaf Hering
2016-12-15 14:32 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-12-16 0:51 ` KY Srinivasan
2016-12-15 15:16 ` Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161215103609.GB6336@aepfle.de \
--to=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).