On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:57:26PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 15.12.2016 06:53, David Gibson wrote: > > Currently, kvmppc_alloc_hpt() both allocates a new hashed page table (HPT) > > and sets it up as the active page table for a VM. For the upcoming HPT > > resize implementation we're going to want to allocate HPTs separately from > > activating them. > > > > So, split the allocation itself out into kvmppc_allocate_hpt() and perform > > the activation with a new kvmppc_set_hpt() function. Likewise we split > > kvmppc_free_hpt(), which just frees the HPT, from kvmppc_release_hpt() > > which unsets it as an active HPT, then frees it. > > > > We also move the logic to fall back to smaller HPT sizes if the first try > > fails into the single caller which used that behaviour, > > kvmppc_hv_setup_htab_rma(). This introduces a slight semantic change, in > > that previously if the initial attempt at CMA allocation failed, we would > > fall back to attempting smaller sizes with the page allocator. Now, we > > try first CMA, then the page allocator at each size. As far as I can tell > > this change should be harmless. > > > > To match, we make kvmppc_free_hpt() just free the actual HPT itself. The > > call to kvmppc_free_lpid() that was there, we move to the single caller. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson > > --- > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_64.h | 3 ++ > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 5 +- > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++---------------- > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 18 +++++-- > > 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_64.h > > index 8810327..6dc4004 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_64.h > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_64.h > > @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ > > > > #include > > > > +/* Power architecture requires HPT is at least 256kB */ > > +#define PPC_MIN_HPT_ORDER 18 > > + > > #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR_POSSIBLE > > static inline struct kvmppc_book3s_shadow_vcpu *svcpu_get(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > { > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > > index 3db6be9..41575b8 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > > @@ -155,9 +155,10 @@ extern void kvmppc_core_destroy_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > extern int kvmppc_kvm_pv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > extern void kvmppc_map_magic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > > > -extern long kvmppc_alloc_hpt(struct kvm *kvm, u32 *htab_orderp); > > +extern int kvmppc_allocate_hpt(struct kvm_hpt_info *info, u32 order); > > +extern void kvmppc_set_hpt(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_hpt_info *info); > > extern long kvmppc_alloc_reset_hpt(struct kvm *kvm, u32 *htab_orderp); > > -extern void kvmppc_free_hpt(struct kvm *kvm); > > +extern void kvmppc_free_hpt(struct kvm_hpt_info *info); > > extern long kvmppc_prepare_vrma(struct kvm *kvm, > > struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem); > > extern void kvmppc_map_vrma(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c > > index fe88132..68bb228 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c > > @@ -40,76 +40,70 @@ > > > > #include "trace_hv.h" > > > > -/* Power architecture requires HPT is at least 256kB */ > > -#define PPC_MIN_HPT_ORDER 18 > > - > > static long kvmppc_virtmode_do_h_enter(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long flags, > > long pte_index, unsigned long pteh, > > unsigned long ptel, unsigned long *pte_idx_ret); > > static void kvmppc_rmap_reset(struct kvm *kvm); > > > > -long kvmppc_alloc_hpt(struct kvm *kvm, u32 *htab_orderp) > > +int kvmppc_allocate_hpt(struct kvm_hpt_info *info, u32 order) > > { > > unsigned long hpt = 0; > > - struct revmap_entry *rev; > > + int cma = 0; > > struct page *page = NULL; > > - long order = KVM_DEFAULT_HPT_ORDER; > > - > > - if (htab_orderp) { > > - order = *htab_orderp; > > - if (order < PPC_MIN_HPT_ORDER) > > - order = PPC_MIN_HPT_ORDER; > > - } > > Not sure, but as far as I can see, *htab_orderp could still be provided > from userspace via kvm_arch_vm_ioctl_hv() -> kvmppc_alloc_reset_hpt() ? > In that case, I think you should still check that the order is bigger > than PPC_MIN_HPT_ORDER, and return an error code otherwise? > Or if you feel confident that this value can never be supplied by > userspace anymore, add at least a BUG_ON(order < PPC_MIN_HPT_ORDER) here? Ah, you're right, I do need to check this. > > + struct revmap_entry *rev; > > + unsigned long npte; > > > > - kvm->arch.hpt.cma = 0; > > + hpt = 0; > > + cma = 0; > > Both hpt and cma are initialized to zero in the variable declarations > already, so the above two lines are redundant. Oops. I even spotted that one at some point, then forgot about it again. > > page = kvm_alloc_hpt_cma(1ul << (order - PAGE_SHIFT)); > > if (page) { > > hpt = (unsigned long)pfn_to_kaddr(page_to_pfn(page)); > > memset((void *)hpt, 0, (1ul << order)); > > - kvm->arch.hpt.cma = 1; > > + cma = 1; > > } > > > > - /* Lastly try successively smaller sizes from the page allocator */ > > - /* Only do this if userspace didn't specify a size via ioctl */ > > - while (!hpt && order > PPC_MIN_HPT_ORDER && !htab_orderp) { > > - hpt = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO|__GFP_REPEAT| > > - __GFP_NOWARN, order - PAGE_SHIFT); > > - if (!hpt) > > - --order; > > - } > > + if (!hpt) > > + hpt = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO|__GFP_REPEAT > > + |__GFP_NOWARN, order - PAGE_SHIFT); > > > > if (!hpt) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > - kvm->arch.hpt.virt = hpt; > > - kvm->arch.hpt.order = order; > > - > > - atomic64_set(&kvm->arch.mmio_update, 0); > > + /* HPTEs are 2**4 bytes long */ > > + npte = 1ul << (order - 4); > > > > /* Allocate reverse map array */ > > - rev = vmalloc(sizeof(struct revmap_entry) * kvmppc_hpt_npte(&kvm->arch.hpt)); > > + rev = vmalloc(sizeof(struct revmap_entry) * npte); > > if (!rev) { > > - pr_err("kvmppc_alloc_hpt: Couldn't alloc reverse map array\n"); > > + pr_err("kvmppc_allocate_hpt: Couldn't alloc reverse map array\n"); > > goto out_freehpt; > > So here you jump to out_freehpt before setting info->virt ... > > > } > > - kvm->arch.hpt.rev = rev; > > - kvm->arch.sdr1 = __pa(hpt) | (order - 18); > > > > - pr_info("KVM guest htab at %lx (order %ld), LPID %x\n", > > - hpt, order, kvm->arch.lpid); > > + info->order = order; > > + info->virt = hpt; > > + info->cma = cma; > > + info->rev = rev; > > > > - if (htab_orderp) > > - *htab_orderp = order; > > return 0; > > > > out_freehpt: > > - if (kvm->arch.hpt.cma) > > + if (cma) > > kvm_free_hpt_cma(page, 1 << (order - PAGE_SHIFT)); > > else > > - free_pages(hpt, order - PAGE_SHIFT); > > + free_pages(info->virt, order - PAGE_SHIFT); > > ... but here you free info->virt which has not been set in case of the > "goto" above. That's clearly wrong. Good catch. Also, there's only one use of that label, so there's not really any reason to use a goto at all. Adjusted. > > return -ENOMEM; > > } > > > > +void kvmppc_set_hpt(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_hpt_info *info) > > +{ > > + atomic64_set(&kvm->arch.mmio_update, 0); > > + kvm->arch.hpt = *info; > > + kvm->arch.sdr1 = __pa(info->virt) | (info->order - 18); > > + > > + pr_info("KVM guest htab at %lx (order %ld), LPID %x\n", > > + info->virt, (long)info->order, kvm->arch.lpid); > > Not directly related to your patch, but these messages pop up in the > dmesg each time I start a guest ... for the normal user who does not > have a clue what "htab" means, this can be pretty much annoying. Could > you maybe turn this into a pr_debug() instead? Maybe, but that's not really in scope for these patches. > > +} > > + > > long kvmppc_alloc_reset_hpt(struct kvm *kvm, u32 *htab_orderp) > > { > > long err = -EBUSY; > > @@ -138,24 +132,28 @@ long kvmppc_alloc_reset_hpt(struct kvm *kvm, u32 *htab_orderp) > > *htab_orderp = order; > > err = 0; > > } else { > > - err = kvmppc_alloc_hpt(kvm, htab_orderp); > > - order = *htab_orderp; > > + struct kvm_hpt_info info; > > + > > + err = kvmppc_allocate_hpt(&info, *htab_orderp); > > + if (err < 0) > > + goto out; > > + kvmppc_set_hpt(kvm, &info); > > Just a matter of taste (I dislike gotos if avoidable), but you could > also do: > > err = kvmppc_allocate_hpt(&info, *htab_orderp); > if (!err) > kvmppc_set_hpt(kvm, &info); > > ... and that's even one line shorter ;-) Hrm. I'd prefer to keep the goto: when most 1-line if statements are the exception/failure case, it's very easy to miss that here it's the success case. > > } > > out: > > mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); > > return err; > > } > > > > -void kvmppc_free_hpt(struct kvm *kvm) > > +void kvmppc_free_hpt(struct kvm_hpt_info *info) > > { > > - kvmppc_free_lpid(kvm->arch.lpid); > > - vfree(kvm->arch.hpt.rev); > > - if (kvm->arch.hpt.cma) > > - kvm_free_hpt_cma(virt_to_page(kvm->arch.hpt.virt), > > - 1 << (kvm->arch.hpt.order - PAGE_SHIFT)); > > + vfree(info->rev); > > + if (info->cma) > > + kvm_free_hpt_cma(virt_to_page(info->virt), > > + 1 << (info->order - PAGE_SHIFT)); > > else > > - free_pages(kvm->arch.hpt.virt, > > - kvm->arch.hpt.order - PAGE_SHIFT); > > + free_pages(info->virt, info->order - PAGE_SHIFT); > > + info->virt = 0; > > + info->order = 0; > > } > > > > /* Bits in first HPTE dword for pagesize 4k, 64k or 16M */ > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c > > index 78baa2b..71c5adb 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c > > @@ -3115,11 +3115,22 @@ static int kvmppc_hv_setup_htab_rma(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > > > /* Allocate hashed page table (if not done already) and reset it */ > > if (!kvm->arch.hpt.virt) { > > - err = kvmppc_alloc_hpt(kvm, NULL); > > - if (err) { > > + int order = KVM_DEFAULT_HPT_ORDER; > > + struct kvm_hpt_info info; > > + > > + err = kvmppc_allocate_hpt(&info, order); > > + /* If we get here, it means userspace didn't specify a > > + * size explicitly. So, try successively smaller > > + * sizes if the default failed. */ > > + while (err < 0 && --order >= PPC_MIN_HPT_ORDER) > > + err = kvmppc_allocate_hpt(&info, order); > > Not sure, but maybe replace "err < 0" with "err == -ENOMEM" in the while > condition? Or should it also loop on other future possible errors types? No, I think you're right. Looping only on -ENOMEM is a better idea. > > + if (err < 0) { > > pr_err("KVM: Couldn't alloc HPT\n"); > > goto out; > > } > > + > > + kvmppc_set_hpt(kvm, &info); > > } > > > > /* Look up the memslot for guest physical address 0 */ > > @@ -3357,7 +3368,8 @@ static void kvmppc_core_destroy_vm_hv(struct kvm *kvm) > > > > kvmppc_free_vcores(kvm); > > > > - kvmppc_free_hpt(kvm); > > + kvmppc_free_lpid(kvm->arch.lpid); > > + kvmppc_free_hpt(&kvm->arch.hpt); > > > > kvmppc_free_pimap(kvm); > > } > > > > Thomas > -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson