Hi! > Lino, have you considered via-rhine.c since its "move work from irq to > workqueue context" changes that started in > 7ab87ff4c770eed71e3777936299292739fcd0fe [*] ? > > It's a shameless plug - originated in r8169.c - but it should be rather > close to what the sxgbe and friends require. Thought / opinion ? > > [*] Including fixes/changes in: > - 3a5a883a8a663b930908cae4abe5ec913b9b2fd2 > - e1efa87241272104d6a12c8b9fcdc4f62634d447 > - 810f19bcb862f8889b27e0c9d9eceac9593925dd > - e45af497950a89459a0c4b13ffd91e1729fffef4 > - a926592f5e4e900f3fa903298c4619a131e60963 > - 559bcac35facfed49ab4f408e162971612dcfdf3 Considering the memory barriers... is something like this neccessary in the via-rhine? AFAICT... we need a barrier after making sure that descriptor is no longer owned by DMA (to make sure we don't get stale data in rest of descriptor)... and we need a barrier before giving the descriptor to the dma, to make sure DMA engine sees the complete update....? Thanks, Pavel diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c index ba5c542..3806e72 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c @@ -1952,6 +1952,7 @@ static void rhine_tx(struct net_device *dev) entry, txstatus); if (txstatus & DescOwn) break; + dma_rmb(); skb = rp->tx_skbuff[entry]; if (txstatus & 0x8000) { netif_dbg(rp, tx_done, dev, @@ -2061,6 +2062,7 @@ static int rhine_rx(struct net_device *dev, int limit) if (desc_status & DescOwn) break; + dma_rmb(); netif_dbg(rp, rx_status, dev, "%s() status %08x\n", __func__, desc_status); @@ -2146,6 +2148,7 @@ static int rhine_rx(struct net_device *dev, int limit) u64_stats_update_end(&rp->rx_stats.syncp); } give_descriptor_to_nic: + dma_wmb(); desc->rx_status = cpu_to_le32(DescOwn); entry = (++rp->cur_rx) % RX_RING_SIZE; } -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html