From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1761061AbcLSPWC (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:22:02 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:36774 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1758686AbcLSPWA (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:22:00 -0500
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:21:57 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: trivial@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/memblock.c: check return value of
 memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal()
Message-ID: <20161219152156.GC5175@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <1482072470-26151-1-git-send-email-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
 <1482072470-26151-3-git-send-email-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1482072470-26151-3-git-send-email-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun 18-12-16 14:47:50, Wei Yang wrote:
> memblock_reserve() may fail in case there is not enough regions.

Have you seen this happenning in the real setups or this is a by-review
driven change?
[...]
>  again:
>  	alloc = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, min_addr, max_addr,
>  					    nid, flags);
> -	if (alloc)
> +	if (alloc && !memblock_reserve(alloc, size))
>  		goto done;
>  
>  	if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
>  		alloc = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, min_addr,
>  						    max_addr, NUMA_NO_NODE,
>  						    flags);
> -		if (alloc)
> +		if (alloc && !memblock_reserve(alloc, size))
>  			goto done;
>  	}

This doesn't look right. You can end up leaking the first allocated
range.

>  
> @@ -1303,7 +1302,6 @@ static void * __init memblock_virt_alloc_internal(
>  
>  	return NULL;
>  done:
> -	memblock_reserve(alloc, size);
>  	ptr = phys_to_virt(alloc);
>  	memset(ptr, 0, size);


>  
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs