From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756736AbcLSVYW (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:24:22 -0500 Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.145]:54762 "EHLO ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751621AbcLSVYT (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:24:19 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2AkEwAZT1hYIOyiLHlcHAEBBAEBCgEBgzcBAQEBAR+BYIJ9g3iHTZQ+AQEBAQEBBoEcjDaGSYQZhhwCAgEBAoIBVAECAQEBAQECBgEBAQEBATgBRYRoAQEBBDocIxAIAw4HAwklDwUlAwcaE4hqq0mLEAEBCAIBJSCFU4UciiEFmnCRJ5BaSY1QhA+BWBUOhDyBWSo0iQoBAQE Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:24:13 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , "Theodore Ts'o" , Chris Mason , David Sterba , Jan Kara , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, logfs@logfs.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, LKML , Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] xfs: introduce and use KM_NOLOCKDEP to silence reclaim lockdep false positives Message-ID: <20161219212413.GN4326@dastard> References: <20161215140715.12732-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20161215140715.12732-3-mhocko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161215140715.12732-3-mhocko@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:07:08PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko > > Now that the page allocator offers __GFP_NOLOCKDEP let's introduce > KM_NOLOCKDEP alias for the xfs allocation APIs. While we are at it > also change KM_NOFS users introduced by b17cb364dbbb ("xfs: fix missing > KM_NOFS tags to keep lockdep happy") and use the new flag for them > instead. There is really no reason to make these allocations contexts > weaker just because of the lockdep which even might not be enabled > in most cases. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko I'd suggest that it might be better to drop this patch for now - it's not necessary for the context flag changeover but does introduce a risk of regressions if the conversion is wrong. Hence I think this is better as a completely separate series which audits and changes all the unnecessary KM_NOFS allocations in one go. I've never liked whack-a-mole style changes like this - do it once, do it properly.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com