From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760149AbcLUJ6l (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 04:58:41 -0500 Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([193.35.52.29]:59530 "EHLO cassarossa.samfundet.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756411AbcLUJ6i (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 04:58:38 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:58:23 +0100 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: "Jin, Yao" Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Milian Wolff , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , "Liang, Kan" Subject: Re: Inlined functions in perf report Message-ID: <20161221095823.GA19249@sesse.net> References: <20161220115954.GA35897@sesse.net> <20161220121755.GL3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <2027151.EnbG4A8ymx@milian-kdab2> <20161220135450.GA32756@kernel.org> <20161220140822.GA10075@sesse.net> <20161220143746.GD32756@kernel.org> <20161220170108.GA6467@sesse.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 4.9.0 on a x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 08:53:33AM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote: > I just pull my repo with the latest perf/core branch, and apply the patch > one by one (git am 0001/0002/.../0005), they can be applied. Maybe you have > to do like that because the mails are probably coming out of order. OK. I applied everything on top of the branch you suggested, and now it's compiling. But seemingly I don't have too much success; on a quick check (perf record -p -g, perf report --inline) I don't get anything marked as (inline), but I get these warnings: BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '6931', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information. BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '18896', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information. and so on for many seemingly random version numbers. It may have been that the stack traces I happened to check don't actually have any inlined functions in them (the load was a bit different from what I've looked at earlier), but the BFD errors are new from what I can see. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/