From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Inlined functions in perf report
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:20:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161221102035.GA31703@sesse.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8193556.VWj3dM7HSI@milian-kdab2>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:09:42AM +0100, Milian Wolff wrote:
> Just to check - did you really compile your code with frame pointers? By
> default, that is not the case, and the above will try to do frame pointer
> unwinding which will then fail. Put differently - do you any stack frames at
> all? Can you try `perf record --call-graph dwarf` instead? Of course, make
> sure you compile your code with `-g -O2` or similar.
I don't specifically use -fno-omit-frame-pointer, no. But the normal stack
unwinding works just fine with mainline perf nevertheless; is this expected?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-21 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-20 11:59 Inlined functions in perf report Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-20 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-20 13:27 ` Milian Wolff
2016-12-20 13:43 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-20 14:03 ` Milian Wolff
2016-12-20 13:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-12-20 14:05 ` Milian Wolff
2016-12-20 14:08 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-20 14:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-12-20 17:01 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-21 0:53 ` Jin, Yao
2016-12-21 9:58 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-21 10:09 ` Milian Wolff
2016-12-21 10:20 ` Steinar H. Gunderson [this message]
2016-12-21 22:56 ` Jin, Yao
2016-12-21 22:58 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161221102035.GA31703@sesse.net \
--to=sgunderson@bigfoot.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).