From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935196AbcLUOhG (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:37:06 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48592 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934923AbcLUOhB (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:37:01 -0500 From: Hans de Goede To: Sebastian Reichel , Chen-Yu Tsai , MyungJoo Ham , Chanwoo Choi Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "russianneuromancer @ ya . ru" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 00/12] power: supply: axp288_charger: Various fixes Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:36:45 +0100 Message-Id: <20161221143657.322-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi All, Here is v2 of my axp288_charger series, which fixup the axp288_charger code to actually work. This implements the suggestion by Chanwoo Choi on how we can use the existing extcon_get_extcon_dev instead of introducing a new extcon_get_extcon_dev_by_id. So this series no longer depends on any extcon sub-sys changes. I've also rebased it on top of linux-power-supply/for-next-next to avoid some conflicts with patches already there which Chanwoo pointed out, so assuming review goes well merging these to for-next-next should go smoothly :) Regards, Hans