From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934418AbcLUSpp (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:45:45 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:64985 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757037AbcLUSpn (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:45:43 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,384,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="21311445" Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:45:41 -0700 From: Ross Zwisler To: Ross Zwisler , Dan Williams , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Jan Kara , Matthew Wilcox , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax: kill uml support Message-ID: <20161221184541.GA13187@linux.intel.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ross Zwisler , Dan Williams , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Jan Kara , Matthew Wilcox , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig References: <148228426023.2477.2662330241414304847.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20161221175320.GB4716@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161221175320.GB4716@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:53:20AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 05:37:40PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > The lack of common transparent-huge-page helpers for UML is becoming > > increasingly painful for fs/dax.c now that it is growing more pmd > > functionality. Add UML to the list of unsupported architectures, and > > clean up no-longer-necessary ifdef as a result. > > > > Cc: Jan Kara > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig > > Cc: Dave Chinner > > Cc: Dave Hansen > > Cc: Matthew Wilcox > > Cc: Alexander Viro > > Cc: Ross Zwisler > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams > > Sure, this is fine, assuming UML was the only problem architecture. I've > pushed this code to my kernel.org tree and should hopefully hear back from > 0day shortly. 0day has given the thumbs up: Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler