From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S941387AbcLVQgn (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:36:43 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57022 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754449AbcLVQgl (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:36:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:36:37 +0100 From: Petr Mladek To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: kbuild test robot , Sergey Senozhatsky , kbuild-all@01.org, Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Tejun Heo , Calvin Owens , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , Peter Hurley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 3/7] printk: introduce per-cpu safe_print seq buffer Message-ID: <20161222163637.GB14894@pathway.suse.cz> References: <20161221143605.2272-4-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <201612220823.uoo2cIsr%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20161222011841.GB644@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161222011841.GB644@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 2016-12-22 10:18:41, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (12/22/16 08:53), kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Sergey, > > > > [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] > > [also build test ERROR on next-20161221] > > [cannot apply to v4.9] > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] > > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sergey-Senozhatsky/printk-use-vprintk_func-in-vprintk/20161222-075616 > > config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config) > > compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 6.2.0 > > reproduce: > > wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > make.cross ARCH=ia64 > > last minute change... > thanks for the report. I guess that it is caused by moving the error-handling change into the 5th patch and solving it another way. I like this move. The patch looks fine now except for the build error. Best Regards, Petr