From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1760115AbdACSHP (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:07:15 -0500
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45716 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1759601AbdACSHI (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:07:08 -0500
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:06:58 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Remove set_task_state()
Message-ID: <20170103180658.GA7003@linux-80c1.suse>
References: <1483121873-21528-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
 <20170103100453.GB5605@leverpostej>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170103100453.GB5605@leverpostej>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017, Mark Rutland wrote:

>Does the below help?

It does, yes. Performance is pretty much the same with either function
without sysreg. With arm no longer in the picture, I'll send up another
patchset with this change as well as Peter's cleanup remarks.

Thanks,
Davidlohr