From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S965416AbdACSP4 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:15:56 -0500
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:35204 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1760357AbdACSPt (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:15:49 -0500
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:13:58 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Remove set_task_state()
Message-ID: <20170103181357.GA21915@leverpostej>
References: <1483121873-21528-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
 <20170103100453.GB5605@leverpostej>
 <20170103180658.GA7003@linux-80c1.suse>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170103180658.GA7003@linux-80c1.suse>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:06:58AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2017, Mark Rutland wrote:
> 
> >Does the below help?
> 
> It does, yes. Performance is pretty much the same with either function
> without sysreg.

Great!

> With arm no longer in the picture, I'll send up another patchset with
> this change as well as Peter's cleanup remarks.

I intend to send a cleaned up version of the arm64 patch to Catalin in a
moment; the read_sysreg() issue is a regression introduced in v4.10-rc1,
so we should be able to get it in as a fix.

Thanks,
Mark.