linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:59:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170105195948.GB2064@jaegeuk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bf8505d-2ac4-e635-685d-287bab6ad0e2@huawei.com>

Hi Chao,

On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
> 
> I can see patch named ("f2fs: call f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio for an error case")
> was merged in dev-test, but I think it's no needed to change error case handling
> like this since f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio should always be called after
> clear_prefree_segments.

Indeed, it's right. ;)

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> On 2017/1/5 11:19, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> This patch relaxes async discard commands to avoid waiting its end_io during
> >>> checkpoint.
> >>> Instead of waiting them during checkpoint, it will be done when actually reusing
> >>> them.
> >>>
> >>> Test on initial partition of nvme drive.
> >>>
> >>>  # time fstrim /mnt/test
> >>>
> >>> Before : 6.158s
> >>> After : 4.822s
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> One comment below,
> > 
> > I still have a comment on this patch.
> > 
> >>> -void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>> +/* This should be covered by global mutex, &sit_i->sentry_lock */
> >>> +void f2fs_wait_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno)
> >>>  {
> >>>  	struct list_head *wait_list = &(SM_I(sbi)->wait_list);
> >>>  	struct bio_entry *be, *tmp;
> >>> @@ -646,7 +650,15 @@ void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>  		struct bio *bio = be->bio;
> >>>  		int err;
> >>>  
> >>> -		wait_for_completion_io(&be->event);
> >>> +		if (!completion_done(&be->event)) {
> >>> +			if ((be->start_segno >= segno &&
> >>> +					be->end_segno <= segno) ||
> >>
> >> segno >= be->start_segno && segno < be->end_segno ?
> > 
> > Can you check this?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-05 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-30 18:51 [PATCH 01/10] f2fs: reassign new segment for mode=lfs Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 02/10] f2fs: fix wrong tracepoints for op and op_flags Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  3:25   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 03/10] f2fs: add submit_bio tracepoint Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  3:32   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-04 23:35   ` [PATCH 03/10 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:07     ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 04/10] f2fs: support IO alignment for DATA and NODE writes Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  8:23   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-04 23:44     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:15       ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 05/10] f2fs: get io size bit from mount option Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 06/10] f2fs: show the max number of atomic operations Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  8:45   ` Chao Yu
2017-01-04 23:50   ` [PATCH 06/10 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:15     ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 07/10] f2fs: don't allow encrypted operations without keys Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  8:56   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  9:29   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-05  3:19     ` Chao Yu
2017-01-05  8:17       ` Chao Yu
2017-01-05 19:59         ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2017-01-05 19:46       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-06  2:06         ` Chao Yu
2017-01-06  2:42           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-06  3:32             ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22  7:23             ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22 21:15               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-23  2:08                 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-23  2:42                   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 09/10] f2fs: avoid needless checkpoint in f2fs_trim_fs Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-22  7:23   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 10/10] f2fs: return fs_trim if there is no candidate Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-22  7:23   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-02-22 21:26     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-23  2:12       ` Chao Yu
2017-02-23  2:47         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  3:24 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 01/10] f2fs: reassign new segment for mode=lfs Chao Yu
2017-01-04 22:48   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:03     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170105195948.GB2064@jaegeuk.local \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).