linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
	Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/64: Make kernel text mapping always take one whole page table in early boot code
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:52:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170105205242.lc4u44hrfxke4b2t@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5j++vFs-+3J3nFC-M_7xG429DC8acV3YYRLNp-9ySt=oMg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:35:57AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> The only reason I had it as an option was for kernel module space. It
> wasn't clear to me at the time if enough space remained for modules in
> all use-cases. It seems like probably there is, so I have no objection
> to making the mapping 1G unconditionally.

Oh someone will crawl out of the woodwork handwaiving that 1G of modules
is not enough. But then that someone would have to choose between kaslr
and >1G modules.

Realistically, on a typical bigger machine, the modules take up
something like <10M:

$ lsmod | awk '{ sum +=$2 } END { print sum }'
7188480

so I'm not really worried if we reduce it by default to 1G. Besides, the
reduction has been there for a while now - since CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE -
so we probably would've heard complaints already...

Btw, we should probably document the reduction in the va map document
too:

---
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:47:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: Document modules space reduction

KASLR reduces module mapping space to 1G, document that.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
 Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt b/Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt
index 5724092db811..a737dfbc198b 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt
+++ b/Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ memory window (this size is arbitrary, it can be raised later if needed).
 The mappings are not part of any other kernel PGD and are only available
 during EFI runtime calls.
 
+CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE (KASLR) reduces module mapping space from 1.5G to 1G.
+
 Note that if CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY is enabled, the direct mapping of all
 physical memory, vmalloc/ioremap space and virtual memory map are randomized.
 Their order is preserved but their base will be offset early at boot time.
-- 
2.11.0

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
-- 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-05 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-04  8:37 [PATCH v3 0/3] Determine kernel image mapping size at runtime for x86_64 Baoquan He
2017-01-04  8:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/64: Make kernel text mapping always take one whole page table in early boot code Baoquan He
2017-01-04 13:00   ` Boris Petkov
2017-01-05  3:28     ` Baoquan He
2017-01-05 14:01       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-05 19:35         ` Kees Cook
2017-01-05 20:52           ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-01-06  9:35             ` Baoquan He
2017-01-04  8:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/64: Introduce a new constant KERNEL_MAPPING_SIZE Baoquan He
2017-01-04  8:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] x86/64/KASLR: Determine the kernel mapping size at run time Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170105205242.lc4u44hrfxke4b2t@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=anderson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuleshovmail@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thgarnie@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).