From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935034AbdAGMtp (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2017 07:49:45 -0500 Received: from www.zeus03.de ([194.117.254.33]:60142 "EHLO mail.zeus03.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932130AbdAGMtf (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2017 07:49:35 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 13:49:31 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= Cc: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBLxJlwaWXFhA==?= , Jean Delvare , Steven Honeyman , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Jochen Eisinger , Gabriele Mazzotta , Andy Lutomirski , Mario_Limonciello@dell.com, Alex Hung , Takashi Iwai , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Register optional lis3lv02d i2c device on Dell machines Message-ID: <20170107124930.GA1902@katana> References: <1482843136-12838-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <201612291000.58489@pali> <20161229134719.GA941@ozzy.nask.waw.pl> <201612291517.37474@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201612291517.37474@pali> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > > + if (!known_i2c_address) { > > > > > + dev_warn(&priv->pci_dev->dev, > > > > > + "Accelerometer lis3lv02d i2c device is present " > > > > > + "but its i2c address is unknown, skipping ...\n"); > > > >=20 > > > > You are probably well aware of this, but checkpatch prefers > > > > keeping long log messages in one line. I am pointing it out > > > > just in case. > > >=20 > > > Yes, but I do not know how to fix it. Splitting message into two > > > lines generates warning. Having long line generates warning too. > >=20 > > Weird, checkpatch does not protest on my machine when the log message > > is written on a single line... >=20 > I hope that i2c maintainers decide how to format that line. Make it one line saying "accelerometer address unknown"? --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYcOPaAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2ZiAQAKAndoV8zE+O3+CefegLmdxO +72BQ9FUm2DuEf4XCdgpZf6qUcH6rCV6Nquz1rGvk0XvdvYrxapCnVQJk5gBPH2n BRS3ZKQN7KR9FJXZBF+3odiyVKXHD1ssrox/b5FTvhD4DjduuMlE1FSY8dwsp4D8 SkE1ajBoNTA/VMO8A7Xa3k/N1Bv4Dl+hG+zmHtcDriXmZN/CrRq0GuLT0UFdDlTi QzU7/hT9y0ALrnPCuJ14xHhTaB4LLu1ST6EI7J0aw0U9z65aRHvwUeMDxvA57tTn XfxbAkCHO5gEZ2u7IdS3a51CcXAxeeSeqOZU8virgIkj/sLDzj/dz8gyU3rUxBVK EbBxR1GsmuC8jizFeIzGB/xsQcZXXeNPU4nfNso3v1ce92QOlZDvUZ6r2a2uvojS Eb0VNTkhp2IsEL9drxpbmxSMyaRbTIq5BzxwxlRFrffedJ5H4BxcoI1DYt31T8Pa OoEhsMaUEVVB2xWYgMhaMGcR352JYObl5Fomcp8v9nGh9ODEB18rGG2AKAIhkMcn DaB4YZfzPYsUCMg7B8zXpFJlUkv0YhpGcoL2z2H9tR9hZsOkSmyBdNqiw4mSFogR /76W/kzXE+mnruULHX8mOTg6LePJ/KeRpYAFIr64TiuOHO1dfPDX5LErqadznHmK BKPohh/EPSueEV20BGqg =1F1a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--