From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1033972AbdAJNvi (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:51:38 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:34638 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1033876AbdAJNvd (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:51:33 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Mahesh Kumar , Lyude , Dhinakaran Pandiyan , Paulo Zanoni Subject: [PATCH 4.9 170/206] drm/i915/gen9: unconditionally apply the memory bandwidth WA Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:37:33 +0100 Message-Id: <20170110131510.685241282@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20170110131502.767555407@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20170110131502.767555407@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Paulo Zanoni commit ee3d532fcb64872bc20be0ee58f7afdb9fa82abe upstream. Mahesh Kumar is already working on a proper implementation for the workaround, but while we still don't have it, let's just unconditionally apply the workaround for everybody and we hope we can close all those numerous bugzilla tickets. Also, I'm not sure how easy it will be to backport the final implementation to the stable Kernels, and this patch here is probably easier to backport. At the present moment I still don't have confirmation that this patch fixes any of the bugs listed below, but we should definitely try testing all of them again. v2: s/intel_needs_memory_bw_wa/skl_needs_memory_bw_wa/ (Lyude). v3: Rebase (dev -> dev_priv change on ilk_wm_max_level). Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94337 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94605 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94884 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95010 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96226 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96828 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97450 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97830 Cc: Mahesh Kumar Cc: Lyude Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni Reviewed-by: Lyude Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1476210338-9797-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -2879,6 +2879,21 @@ skl_wm_plane_id(const struct intel_plane } } +/* + * FIXME: We still don't have the proper code detect if we need to apply the WA, + * so assume we'll always need it in order to avoid underruns. + */ +static bool skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct intel_atomic_state *state) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev); + + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) || + IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)) + return true; + + return false; +} + static bool intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { @@ -2999,9 +3014,10 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_at struct drm_device *dev = state->dev; struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state); - struct drm_crtc *crtc; + struct intel_crtc *crtc; + struct intel_plane *plane; enum pipe pipe; - int level, plane; + int level, id, latency; if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv)) return false; @@ -3019,27 +3035,36 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_at /* Since we're now guaranteed to only have one active CRTC... */ pipe = ffs(intel_state->active_crtcs) - 1; - crtc = dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe]; + crtc = to_intel_crtc(dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe]); - if (crtc->state->mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) + if (crtc->base.state->mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) return false; - for_each_plane(dev_priv, pipe, plane) { + for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, crtc, plane) { + id = skl_wm_plane_id(plane); + /* Skip this plane if it's not enabled */ - if (intel_state->wm_results.plane[pipe][plane][0] == 0) + if (intel_state->wm_results.plane[pipe][id][0] == 0) continue; /* Find the highest enabled wm level for this plane */ for (level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev); - intel_state->wm_results.plane[pipe][plane][level] == 0; --level) + intel_state->wm_results.plane[pipe][id][level] == 0; --level) { } + latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level]; + + if (skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(intel_state) && + plane->base.state->fb->modifier[0] == + I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED) + latency += 15; + /* * If any of the planes on this pipe don't enable wm levels * that incur memory latencies higher then 30µs we can't enable * the SAGV */ - if (dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level] < SKL_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME) + if (latency < SKL_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME) return false; } @@ -3549,12 +3574,18 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const st uint32_t width = 0, height = 0; uint32_t plane_pixel_rate; uint32_t y_tile_minimum, y_min_scanlines; + struct intel_atomic_state *state = + to_intel_atomic_state(cstate->base.state); + bool apply_memory_bw_wa = skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(state); if (latency == 0 || !cstate->base.active || !intel_pstate->base.visible) { *enabled = false; return 0; } + if (apply_memory_bw_wa && fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED) + latency += 15; + width = drm_rect_width(&intel_pstate->base.src) >> 16; height = drm_rect_height(&intel_pstate->base.src) >> 16; @@ -3606,6 +3637,8 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const st plane_blocks_per_line); y_tile_minimum = plane_blocks_per_line * y_min_scanlines; + if (apply_memory_bw_wa) + y_tile_minimum *= 2; if (fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED || fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {