From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751943AbdAMPBz (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:01:55 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:36625 "EHLO mail-io0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751678AbdAMPBv (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:01:51 -0500 From: Jens Axboe X-Google-Original-From: Jens Axboe Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 08:01:05 -0700 To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, osandov@osandov.com, bart.vanassche@sandisk.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] blk-mq: export some helpers we need to the scheduling framework Message-ID: <20170113150105.GB23338@kernel.dk> References: <1484170803-9311-1-git-send-email-axboe@fb.com> <1484170803-9311-6-git-send-email-axboe@fb.com> <20170113081714.GC637@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170113081714.GC637@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 13 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Do we really need to make any of the blk-mq scheduling modular? I think so - I want to be able to turn it on and off. And since we already have a framework for this (see reply in other patch), I don't see a reason NOT to do this. -- Jens Axboe