From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
stefanha@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio_scsi: Implement fc_host
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 01:26:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170116172656.GB11780@lemon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <95f96b48-aa75-0094-a634-db9c13035336@redhat.com>
On Mon, 01/16 17:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 16/01/2017 17:04, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > + node_name = virtio_cread64(vdev,
> > + offsetof(struct virtio_scsi_config, primary_wwnn));
> > + port_name = virtio_cread64(vdev,
> > + offsetof(struct virtio_scsi_config, primary_wwpn));
> > + } else {
> > + node_name = virtio_cread64(vdev,
> > + offsetof(struct virtio_scsi_config, secondary_wwnn));
> > + port_name = virtio_cread64(vdev,
> > + offsetof(struct virtio_scsi_config, secondary_wwpn));
>
> Is the endianness correct for big-endian host here?
I think so. The fc_host sysfs uses u64 to represent port_name and node_name,
this patch does the same, so using virtio_* helpers for these fields should
handle the endianness correctly.
Maybe we should use u64 in struct virtio_scsi_config as well?
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-16 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-16 16:04 [PATCH 0/2] virtio-scsi: Implement FC_HOST feature Fam Zheng
2017-01-16 16:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] virtio_scsi: Add fc_host definitions Fam Zheng
2017-01-16 16:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] virtio_scsi: Implement fc_host Fam Zheng
2017-01-16 16:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-16 17:26 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2017-01-17 13:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-17 14:05 ` Fam Zheng
2017-01-17 15:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-16 19:02 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-17 3:40 ` Fam Zheng
2017-01-16 20:24 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-16 17:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] virtio-scsi: Implement FC_HOST feature Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-17 3:37 ` Fam Zheng
2017-01-16 17:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-16 20:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170116172656.GB11780@lemon \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).