linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>,
	Janis Danisevskis <jdanis@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dev@opencontainers.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] procfs: change the owner of non-dumpable and writeable files
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 10:29:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170119092930.GJ30786@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170118040159.4751-1-asarai@suse.de>

Cc Eric

On Wed 18-01-17 15:01:59, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> In order to protect against ptrace(2) and similar attacks on container
> runtimes when they join namespaces, many runtimes set mm->dumpable to
> SUID_DUMP_DISABLE. However, doing this means that attempting to set up
> an unprivileged user namespace will fail because an unprivileged process
> can no longer access /proc/self/{setgroups,{uid,gid}_map} for the
> container process (which is the same uid as the runtime process).
> 
> Fix this by changing pid_getattr to *also* change the owner of regular
> files that have a mode of 0644 (when the process is not dumpable). This
> ensures that the important /proc/[pid]/... files mentioned above are
> properly accessible by a container runtime in a rootless container
> context.
> 
> The most blantant issue is that a non-dumpable process in a rootless
> container context is unable to open /proc/self/setgroups, because it
> doesn't own the file.
> 
> int main(void)
> {
> 	prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> 	unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER);
> 
> 	/* This will fail. */
> 	int fd = open("/proc/self/setgroups", O_WRONLY);
> 	if (fd < 0)
> 		abort();
> 
> 	return 0;
> }

I do agree that failing to open anything in /proc/self/ is more than
unexepcted! I cannot judge the patch but my gut feeling tells me that
the fix should be somewhere in the open handler.

One nit below

> 
> Cc: dev@opencontainers.org
> Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
> ---
>  fs/proc/base.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index ca651ac00660..ebabb12f4536 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1729,6 +1729,7 @@ int pid_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry, struct kstat *stat)
>  			return -ENOENT;
>  		}
>  		if ((inode->i_mode == (S_IFDIR|S_IRUGO|S_IXUGO)) ||
> +		    (inode->i_mode == (S_IFREG|S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR)) ||
>  		    task_dumpable(task)) {
>  			cred = __task_cred(task);
>  			stat->uid = cred->euid;
> @@ -1770,6 +1771,7 @@ int pid_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
>  
>  	if (task) {
>  		if ((inode->i_mode == (S_IFDIR|S_IRUGO|S_IXUGO)) ||
> +		    (inode->i_mode == (S_IFREG|S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR)) ||
>  		    task_dumpable(task)) {
>  			rcu_read_lock();
>  			cred = __task_cred(task);
> @@ -2394,7 +2396,7 @@ static int proc_pident_instantiate(struct inode *dir,
>  	return -ENOENT;
>  }
>  
> -static struct dentry *proc_pident_lookup(struct inode *dir, 
> +static struct dentry *proc_pident_lookup(struct inode *dir,
>  					 struct dentry *dentry,
>  					 const struct pid_entry *ents,
>  					 unsigned int nents)
> @@ -2536,7 +2538,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry attr_dir_stuff[] = {
>  
>  static int proc_attr_dir_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
>  {
> -	return proc_pident_readdir(file, ctx, 
> +	return proc_pident_readdir(file, ctx,
>  				   attr_dir_stuff, ARRAY_SIZE(attr_dir_stuff));
>  }

this two are just whitespace noise

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-19  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18  4:01 [PATCH] procfs: change the owner of non-dumpable and writeable files Aleksa Sarai
2017-01-18 23:22 ` Kees Cook
2017-01-18 23:34   ` Aleksa Sarai
2017-01-19  9:29 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-01-19 13:08   ` Aleksa Sarai
2017-01-20  1:57     ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-01-20  2:35       ` Aleksa Sarai
2017-01-20  4:35         ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-01-25  6:43           ` Aleksa Sarai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170119092930.GJ30786@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=asarai@suse.de \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dev@opencontainers.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jdanis@google.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mguzik@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).