From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932258AbdA0Obv (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:31:51 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:54720 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754752AbdA0Oam (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:30:42 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:30:52 +0100 From: Greg KH To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Ming Lei , Borislav Petkov , wagi@monom.org, Tom Gundersen , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Vikram Mulukutla , Stephen Boyd , Mark Brown , zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Takashi Iwai , Johannes Berg , Christian Lamparter , Hauke Mehrtens , Josh Boyer , Dmitry Torokhov , David Woodhouse , jslaby@suse.com, Linus Torvalds , luto@amacapital.net, Fengguang Wu , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , Abhay_Salunke@dell.com, Julia Lawall , Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr, nicolas.palix@imag.fr, dhowells@redhat.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, Arend Van Spriel , Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] p54: convert to sysdata API Message-ID: <20170127143052.GA18706@kroah.com> References: <20161216114632.22559-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20170112150244.12700-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20170112150244.12700-4-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20170119113857.GQ28024@kroah.com> <20170119162751.GJ13946@wotan.suse.de> <20170126215005.GU13946@wotan.suse.de> <20170127074706.GA31112@kroah.com> <20170127140731.GB8206@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 03:14:14PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > Does that patch really "simplify" anything? Anyway, resend it if the > > maintainer of the subsystem ignores it (you did cc: the correct people, > > right?) > > According to the MAINTAINERS there isn't firmware API tree / > maintainer. Also this is just a cleanup so I don't know if I should > expect some random maintainer (e.g. wireless tree) to pick it. I don't think you looked very hard: $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --file drivers/base/firmware_class.c Ming Lei (maintainer:FIRMWARE LOADER (request_firmware)) "Luis R. Rodriguez" (maintainer:FIRMWARE LOADER (request_firmware)) Greg Kroah-Hartman (supporter:DRIVER CORE, KOBJECTS, DEBUGFS, KERNFS AND SYSFS) linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:FIRMWARE LOADER (request_firmware)) Please try again... greg k-h