On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:54:07PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>
> 
> This patch provides separate set of pwm ops utilized by
> i.MX's PWMv1 and PWMv2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>
> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Changes for v5:
> - None
> 
> Changes for v4:
> - None
> 
> Changes for v3:
> - Adjust the code to work with ipg clock removed
> 
> Changes for v2:
> - New patch
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> index b1d1e50..0fa480d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,14 @@ static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
>  }
>  
> -static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops = {
> +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = {
> +	.enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> +	.disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> +	.config = imx_pwm_config,
> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = {

Can't these two be const? No need to respin for only this, just let me
know and I can make the change while applying.

Thierry