From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: add more managed APIs
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:55:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170130185551.GM8801@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170129180743.GA10917@dtor-ws>
On 01/29, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> When converting a driver to managed resources it is desirable to be able to
> manage all resources in the same fashion. This change allows managing
> clocks in the same way we manage many other resources.
Can you please add 'managing clock prepared and enabled state in
the same way'?
The current wording makes it sound like we don't have
devm_clk_get() when we do.
>
> This adds the following managed APIs:
>
> - devm_clk_prepare()/devm_clk_unprepare();
> - devm_clk_prepare_enable()/devm_clk_disable_unprepare().
Wouldn't this be preceded by a devm_clk_get() call? Wouldn't it
be even shorter to have the APIs
devm_clk_get_and_prepare()/devm_clk_unprepare_and_put()
devm_clk_get_and_prepare_enable()/devm_clk_disable_unprepare_and_put()
instead?
Is there any other subsystem that has similar functionality?
Regulators? GPIOs? Resets? I'm just curious if those subsystems
also need similar changes.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-30 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-28 18:40 [PATCH] clk: add more managed APIs Dmitry Torokhov
2017-01-28 19:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-28 19:22 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-01-28 21:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-01-28 23:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-29 16:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-01-29 18:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Dmitry Torokhov
2017-01-29 18:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-01-30 18:55 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2017-01-30 19:22 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-01-30 21:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-30 21:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-01-30 22:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-30 22:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-01-31 8:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-01-31 0:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-01-31 17:20 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-01-31 18:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-01-31 19:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-01-31 0:57 ` [PATCH v3] " Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-07 3:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-14 19:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-02-14 19:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-14 20:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-02-14 20:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170130185551.GM8801@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).