From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1750861AbdAaIPg (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 31 Jan 2017 03:15:36 -0500
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:17070 "EHLO
        userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750856AbdAaIPI (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 31 Jan 2017 03:15:08 -0500
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:13:29 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
        Liang Zhen <liang.zhen@intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Doug Oucharek <doug.s.oucharek@intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
        Amir Shehata <amir.shehata@intel.com>,
        Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 60/60] staging: lustre: libcfs: fix minimum size check
 for libcfs ioctl
Message-ID: <20170131081329.GE6881@mwanda>
References: <1485648328-2141-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>
 <1485648328-2141-61-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>
 <20170130105156.GA6881@mwanda>
 <alpine.LFD.2.20.1701310203320.7738@casper.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1701310203320.7738@casper.infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 02:25:22AM +0000, James Simmons wrote:
> This sounds like a separate patch. I will open a ticket about this and
> your comments below.

There are a some other places that need a size requirement like
LNetCtl().

It really feels like it should be a part of this patch because this
patch is introducing a security breakage and it's just fixing a normal
bug.

regards,
dan carpenter