From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752760AbdBJRQp (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:16:45 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49078 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751555AbdBJRQm (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:16:42 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:09:10 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Logan Gunthorpe Cc: Keith Busch , Myron Stowe , Bjorn Helgaas , Geert Uytterhoeven , Jonathan Corbet , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Morton , Emil Velikov , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Guenter Roeck , Jarkko Sakkinen , Linus Walleij , Ryusuke Konishi , Stefan Berger , Wei Zhang , Kurt Schwemmer , Stephen Bates , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] MicroSemi Switchtec management interface driver Message-ID: <20170210170910.GA25450@kroah.com> References: <1486058763-7730-1-git-send-email-logang@deltatee.com> <1486058763-7730-2-git-send-email-logang@deltatee.com> <20170210145124.GA24594@kroah.com> <20170210165550.GA23959@kroah.com> <9a1d4150-b329-1a69-9efd-f06da32afe02@deltatee.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9a1d4150-b329-1a69-9efd-f06da32afe02@deltatee.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:03:10AM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On 10/02/17 09:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Yes, but try it yourself to verify it really is correct :) > > Yes, of course... turns out it wasn't. I accidentally refereed to dev > before I assigned it. I had mainly just wanted your feedback to ensure > that switching to device_register made sense. > > > And it can just be an add-on patch, no need to respin a whole new > > version for just that simple change, it doesn't hurt anything as-is, > > it's just "not needed". > > Ok... How should I do that exactly? Attempt to reply to the thread with > another patch? Sure, or just wait for these to be applied to the PCI tree and then send a follow-on patch. It's up to Bjorn really, as to what he wants. thanks, greg k-h