From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752821AbdBMTAD (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:00:03 -0500
Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:34992 "EHLO muru.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752338AbdBMTAC (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:00:02 -0500
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:59:57 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk
Message-ID: <20170213185956.GM3897@atomide.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi all,

Looks like commit f975237b7682 ("printk: use printk_safe buffers in
printk") causes "possible circular locking dependency detected " for
me on the first suspend.

Reverting the following four patches in next makes it go away:

d9c23523ed98 ("printk: drop call_console_drivers() unused param")
de6fcbdb68b2 ("printk: convert the rest to printk-safe")
8b1742c9c207 ("printk: remove zap_locks() function")
f975237b7682 ("printk: use printk_safe buffers in printk")

See below for the warning, #1 seems to be the relevant one as pointed
out by Peter.

Regards,

Tony

8< ---------------------
[   48.950592] ======================================================
[   48.950622] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[   48.950622] 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170213+ #101 Not tainted
[   48.950622] -------------------------------------------------------
[   48.950622] kworker/0:0/3 is trying to acquire lock:
[   48.950653]  (tk_core){----..}, at: [<c01cc624>] retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90
[   48.950683] 
               but task is already holding lock:
[   48.950683]  (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01cc610>] retrigger_next_event+0x38/0x90
[   48.950714] 
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[   48.950714] 
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[   48.950714] 
               -> #5 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}:
[   48.950744]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64
[   48.950775]        lock_hrtimer_base+0x28/0x58
[   48.950775]        hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x20/0x5c8
[   48.950775]        __enqueue_rt_entity+0x320/0x360
[   48.950805]        enqueue_rt_entity+0x2c/0x44
[   48.950805]        enqueue_task_rt+0x24/0x94
[   48.950836]        ttwu_do_activate+0x54/0xc0
[   48.950836]        try_to_wake_up+0x248/0x5c8
[   48.950836]        __setup_irq+0x420/0x5f0
[   48.950836]        request_threaded_irq+0xdc/0x184
[   48.950866]        devm_request_threaded_irq+0x58/0xa4
[   48.950866]        omap_i2c_probe+0x530/0x6a0
[   48.950897]        platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xb0
[   48.950897]        driver_probe_device+0x1f8/0x2cc
[   48.950897]        __driver_attach+0xc0/0xc4
[   48.950927]        bus_for_each_dev+0x6c/0xa0
[   48.950927]        bus_add_driver+0x100/0x210
[   48.950927]        driver_register+0x78/0xf4
[   48.950958]        do_one_initcall+0x3c/0x16c
[   48.950958]        kernel_init_freeable+0x20c/0x2d8
[   48.950958]        kernel_init+0x8/0x110
[   48.950988]        ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[   48.950988] 
               -> #4 (&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock){-.-...}:
[   48.951019]        _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50
[   48.951019]        rq_offline_rt+0x9c/0x2bc
[   48.951019]        set_rq_offline.part.2+0x2c/0x58
[   48.951049]        rq_attach_root+0x134/0x144
[   48.951049]        cpu_attach_domain+0x18c/0x6f4
[   48.951049]        build_sched_domains+0xba4/0xd80
[   48.951080]        sched_init_smp+0x68/0x10c
[   48.951080]        kernel_init_freeable+0x160/0x2d8
[   48.951080]        kernel_init+0x8/0x110
[   48.951080]        ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[   48.951110] 
               -> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
[   48.951110]        _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50
[   48.951141]        task_fork_fair+0x30/0x124
[   48.951141]        sched_fork+0x194/0x2e0
[   48.951141]        copy_process.part.5+0x448/0x1a20
[   48.951171]        _do_fork+0x98/0x7e8
[   48.951171]        kernel_thread+0x2c/0x34
[   48.951171]        rest_init+0x1c/0x18c
[   48.951202]        start_kernel+0x35c/0x3d4
[   48.951202]        0x8000807c
[   48.951202] 
               -> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
[   48.951232]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64
[   48.951232]        try_to_wake_up+0x30/0x5c8
[   48.951232]        up+0x4c/0x60
[   48.951263]        __up_console_sem+0x2c/0x58
[   48.951263]        console_unlock+0x3b4/0x650
[   48.951263]        vprintk_emit+0x270/0x474
[   48.951293]        vprintk_default+0x20/0x28
[   48.951293]        printk+0x20/0x30
[   48.951324]        kauditd_hold_skb+0x94/0xb8
[   48.951324]        kauditd_thread+0x1a4/0x56c
[   48.951324]        kthread+0x104/0x148
[   48.951354]        ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[   48.951354] 
               -> #1 ((console_sem).lock){-.....}:
[   48.951385]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64
[   48.951385]        down_trylock+0xc/0x2c
[   48.951385]        __down_trylock_console_sem+0x24/0x80
[   48.951385]        console_trylock+0x10/0x8c
[   48.951416]        vprintk_emit+0x264/0x474
[   48.951416]        vprintk_default+0x20/0x28
[   48.951416]        printk+0x20/0x30
[   48.951446]        tk_debug_account_sleep_time+0x5c/0x70
[   48.951446]        __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime.constprop.3+0x170/0x1a0
[   48.951446]        timekeeping_resume+0x218/0x23c
[   48.951477]        syscore_resume+0x94/0x42c
[   48.951477]        suspend_enter+0x554/0x9b4
[   48.951477]        suspend_devices_and_enter+0xd8/0x4b4
[   48.951507]        enter_state+0x934/0xbd4
[   48.951507]        pm_suspend+0x14/0x70
[   48.951507]        state_store+0x68/0xc8
[   48.951538]        kernfs_fop_write+0xf4/0x1f8
[   48.951538]        __vfs_write+0x1c/0x114
[   48.951538]        vfs_write+0xa0/0x168
[   48.951568]        SyS_write+0x3c/0x90
[   48.951568]        __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x10
[   48.951568] 
               -> #0 (tk_core){----..}:
[   48.951599]        lock_acquire+0xe0/0x294
[   48.951599]        ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x5c/0x1d4
[   48.951629]        retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90
[   48.951629]        on_each_cpu+0x40/0x7c
[   48.951629]        clock_was_set_work+0x14/0x20
[   48.951660]        process_one_work+0x2b4/0x808
[   48.951660]        worker_thread+0x3c/0x550
[   48.951660]        kthread+0x104/0x148
[   48.951690]        ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[   48.951690] 
               other info that might help us debug this:

[   48.951690] Chain exists of:
                 tk_core --> &rt_b->rt_runtime_lock --> hrtimer_bases.lock

[   48.951721]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[   48.951721]        CPU0                    CPU1
[   48.951721]        ----                    ----
[   48.951721]   lock(hrtimer_bases.lock);
[   48.951751]                                lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
[   48.951751]                                lock(hrtimer_bases.lock);
[   48.951751]   lock(tk_core);
[   48.951782] 
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[   48.951782] 3 locks held by kworker/0:0/3:
[   48.951782]  #0:  ("events"){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0156590>] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x808
[   48.951812]  #1:  (hrtimer_work){+.+...}, at: [<c0156590>] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x808
[   48.951843]  #2:  (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01cc610>] retrigger_next_event+0x38/0x90
[   48.951843] 
               stack backtrace:
[   48.951873] CPU: 0 PID: 3 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170213+ #101
[   48.951873] Hardware name: Generic OMAP36xx (Flattened Device Tree)
[   48.951904] Workqueue: events clock_was_set_work
[   48.951904] [<c0110208>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c224>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[   48.951934] [<c010c224>] (show_stack) from [<c04ca6c0>] (dump_stack+0xac/0xe0)
[   48.951934] [<c04ca6c0>] (dump_stack) from [<c019b5cc>] (print_circular_bug+0x1d0/0x308)
[   48.951965] [<c019b5cc>] (print_circular_bug) from [<c019d2a8>] (validate_chain+0xf50/0x1324)
[   48.951965] [<c019d2a8>] (validate_chain) from [<c019ec18>] (__lock_acquire+0x468/0x7e8)
[   48.951995] [<c019ec18>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c019f634>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x294)
[   48.951995] [<c019f634>] (lock_acquire) from [<c01d0ea0>] (ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x5c/0x1d4)
[   48.952026] [<c01d0ea0>] (ktime_get_update_offsets_now) from [<c01cc624>] (retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90)
[   48.952026] [<c01cc624>] (retrigger_next_event) from [<c01e4e24>] (on_each_cpu+0x40/0x7c)
[   48.952056] [<c01e4e24>] (on_each_cpu) from [<c01cafc4>] (clock_was_set_work+0x14/0x20)
[   48.952056] [<c01cafc4>] (clock_was_set_work) from [<c015664c>] (process_one_work+0x2b4/0x808)
[   48.952087] [<c015664c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0157774>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x550)
[   48.952087] [<c0157774>] (worker_thread) from [<c015d644>] (kthread+0x104/0x148)
[   48.952087] [<c015d644>] (kthread) from [<c0107830>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24)
[   48.952911] PM: noirq resume of devices complete after 33.355 msecs
...