From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754603AbdBPLG1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 06:06:27 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:37349 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753333AbdBPLGX (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 06:06:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:06:18 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Mike Galbraith , RT , LKML , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [RT] lockdep munching nr_list_entries like popcorn Message-ID: <20170216110618.GC6557@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1487224986.5258.45.camel@gmx.de> <1487235000.5258.48.camel@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:01:18AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 09:37 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > ... > > > > swapvec_lock? Oodles of 'em? Nope. > > > > > > Well, it's a per cpu lock and the lru_cache_add() variants might be called > > > from a gazillion of different call chains, but yes, it does not make a lot > > > of sense. We'll have a look. > > > > Adding explicit local_irq_lock_init() makes things heaps better, so > > presumably we need better lockdep-foo in DEFINE_LOCAL_IRQ_LOCK(). > > Bah. #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC #define PER_CPU_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname) \ .dep_map = { \ .key = ({ static struct lock_class_key __key; &__key }), \ .name = #lockname, \ } #else #define PER_CPU_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname) #endif #define DEFINE_LOCAL_IRQ_LOCK(lvar) \ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct local_irq_lock, lvar) = { \ .lock = { .rlock = { \ .raw_lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, \ SPIN_DEBUG_INIT(lvar) \ PER_CPU_DEP_MAP_INIT(lvar) \ } } \ } That's fairly horrible for poking inside all the internals, but it might just work ;-)