From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the net-next tree
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:06:29 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170222110629.53d01cf5@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
include/linux/filter.h
between commit:
9d876e79df6a ("bpf: fix unlocking of jited image when module ronx not set")
from the net-next tree and commit:
0f5bf6d0afe4 ("arch: Rename CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA and CONFIG_DEBUG_MODULE_RONX")
from the kspp tree.
Hmmm, both these change the ifdef guards I have used the one from the
net-next tree (CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY) for today, please let me know
if that is not correct.
I fixed it up (see above) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-22 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-22 0:06 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2017-02-22 6:35 ` linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the net-next tree Daniel Borkmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-07 5:29 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-07 19:23 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-27 9:27 Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-05 4:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-21 23:51 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-22 6:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-02-19 23:56 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-20 9:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-02-08 1:30 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170222110629.53d01cf5@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=keescook@google.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).