From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751440AbdBXJbH (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:31:07 -0500 Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([193.35.52.29]:42639 "EHLO cassarossa.samfundet.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750951AbdBXJbD (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:31:03 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:14:30 +0100 From: Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E5vard?= Skinnemoen Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Andy Shevchenko , Boris Brezillon , Richard Weinberger , "open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY..." , Nicolas Ferre , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Wenyou Yang , Josh Wu , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Cyrille Pitchen , linux-arm Mailing List , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , devicetree Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: nand: Cleanup/rework the atmel_nand driver Message-ID: <20170224081430.GB19663@samfundet.no> References: <20170221112641.6276c001@bbrezillon> <20170221112720.ynehsryprhrhzjla@piout.net> <20170221162133.jch6yzpotj4s7zob@piout.net> <20170221171438.e5hvruoixafpcdps@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni > wrote: >> On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> A few weeks ago, I was telling Boris to let it not build for a while and >> then remove it. You already went out of your way to make it work. Again, >> feel free to send a patch removing avr32. I can only see a lot of >> benefits for the Atmel ARM SoCs and the many cleanups that will follow. > > Agree, I can't help but feel that the AVR32 support is doing more harm > than good at this point. I also agree on this, I can relate to Nicolas (and Atmel friends) having to always think about the less-maintained AVR32 parts when improving drivers. >> If nobody complains about the 4.10 breakage, You'll have plenty of time >> to remove it for 4.12 > > I'm fine with that, but I haven't put much effort into keeping it > alive lately. If Hans-Christian agrees, I'm willing to post a patch to > remove it, or ack someone else's patch. Then lets plan this for 4.12, either you Håvard whip up a patch or I can eventually do it. I can push it through the linux-avr32 git tree on kernel.org. -- mvh Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt