From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Huewe <peter.huewe@infineon.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterhuewe@gmx.de, Christophe Ricard <christophe-h.ricard@st.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tpm_tis_spi: Check correct byte for wait state indicator
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:57:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170224125743.dtiot3ygqstneve4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487261306-2494-4-git-send-email-peter.huewe@infineon.com>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 04:08:24PM +0000, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Wait states are signaled in the last byte received from the TPM in
> response to the header, not the first byte. Check rx_buf[3] instead of
> rx_buf[0].
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Fixes: 0edbfea537d1 ("tpm/tpm_tis_spi: Add support for spi phy")
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <peter.huewe@infineon.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkien <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
/Jarkko
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
> index d782b9974c14..16938e2253d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u8 len,
> u8 *buffer, u8 direction)
> {
> struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(data);
> - int ret, i;
> + int ret;
> struct spi_message m;
> struct spi_transfer spi_xfer = {
> .tx_buf = phy->tx_buf,
> @@ -85,25 +85,27 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u8 len,
> if (ret < 0)
> goto exit;
>
> - phy->tx_buf[0] = 0;
> -
> - /* According to TCG PTP specification, if there is no TPM present at
> - * all, then the design has a weak pull-up on MISO. If a TPM is not
> - * present, a pull-up on MISO means that the SB controller sees a 1,
> - * and will latch in 0xFF on the read.
> - */
> - for (i = 0; (phy->rx_buf[0] & 0x01) == 0 && i < TPM_RETRY; i++) {
> - spi_xfer.len = 1;
> - spi_message_init(&m);
> - spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer, &m);
> - ret = spi_sync_locked(phy->spi_device, &m);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if ((phy->rx_buf[3] & 0x01) == 0) {
> + // handle SPI wait states
> + int i;
> +
> + phy->tx_buf[0] = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < TPM_RETRY; i++) {
> + spi_xfer.len = 1;
> + spi_message_init(&m);
> + spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer, &m);
> + ret = spi_sync_locked(phy->spi_device, &m);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto exit;
> + if (phy->rx_buf[0] & 0x01)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (i == TPM_RETRY) {
> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> goto exit;
> - }
> -
> - if (i == TPM_RETRY) {
> - ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> - goto exit;
> + }
> }
>
> spi_xfer.cs_change = 0;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-24 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-16 16:08 [PATCH 0/5] Fix whole native SPI TPM driver Peter Huewe
2017-02-16 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] tpm_tis_spi: Use single function to transfer data Peter Huewe
2017-02-24 12:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-02-16 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] tpm_tis_spi: Abort transfer when too many wait states are signaled Peter Huewe
2017-02-17 5:04 ` Christophe Ricard
2017-02-24 12:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-02-16 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] tpm_tis_spi: Check correct byte for wait state indicator Peter Huewe
2017-02-17 5:09 ` Christophe Ricard
2017-02-17 7:15 ` Peter Huewe
2017-02-24 12:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2017-02-16 16:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] tpm_tis_spi: Remove limitation of transfers to MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE bytes Peter Huewe
2017-02-16 17:27 ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-17 5:11 ` Christophe Ricard
2017-02-17 7:19 ` Peter Huewe
2017-02-24 11:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-02-24 12:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-02-22 21:19 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix whole native SPI TPM driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-02-22 22:32 ` Peter Huewe
2017-02-24 15:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170224125743.dtiot3ygqstneve4@intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com \
--cc=christophe-h.ricard@st.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.huewe@infineon.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).