> On Mon, 22 Feb 2017, Ajay Kaher wrote: >  >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Ajay Kaher wrote: >>  >>> Alan, as per my understanding I have shifted the lock from >>> release_usb_class() to destroy_usb_class() in patch v3.  >>> If it is not right, please explain in detail which race condition >>> I have missed and also share your suggestions. >>>  >>  >> Have you considered what would happen if destroy_usb_class() ran, but  >> some other CPU was still holding a reference to usb_class?  And what if  >> the last reference gets dropped later on, while init_usb_class() is  >> running? >  > Access of usb_class->kref is only from either init_usb_class() > or destroy_usb_class(), and both these functions are now protected > with Mutex Locking in patch v3, so there is no chance of race condition > as per above scenarios. >  >> Maybe that's not possible here, but it is possible in general for  >> refcounted objects.  So yes, this code is probably okay, but it isn't  >> good form. >  > As per my understanding, I found to be one of the best possible solution > for this problem and this solutiuon don't have any side effect. Alan, I had shared modified Patch v3 as per your inputs to prevent the race condition during simultaneously calling of init_usb_class(). If you think there is scope to improve the patch, please share your inputs. thanks, ajay kaher Signed-off-by: Ajay Kaher --- drivers/usb/core/file.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/file.c b/drivers/usb/core/file.c index 822ced9..a12d184 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/core/file.c +++ b/drivers/usb/core/file.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #define MAX_USB_MINORS 256 static const struct file_operations *usb_minors[MAX_USB_MINORS]; static DECLARE_RWSEM(minor_rwsem); +static DEFINE_MUTEX(init_usb_class_mutex); static int usb_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) { @@ -109,8 +110,10 @@ static void release_usb_class(struct kref *kref) static void destroy_usb_class(void) { + mutex_lock(&init_usb_class_mutex); if (usb_class) kref_put(&usb_class->kref, release_usb_class); + mutex_unlock(&init_usb_class_mutex); } int usb_major_init(void) @@ -171,7 +174,10 @@ int usb_register_dev(struct usb_interface *intf, if (intf->minor >= 0) return -EADDRINUSE; + mutex_lock(&init_usb_class_mutex); retval = init_usb_class(); + mutex_unlock(&init_usb_class_mutex); + if (retval) return retval;