linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mm: don't avoid high-priority reclaim on unreclaimable nodes
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:21:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170301152144.GE11730@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170228214007.5621-6-hannes@cmpxchg.org>

On Tue 28-02-17 16:40:03, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> 246e87a93934 ("memcg: fix get_scan_count() for small targets") sought
> to avoid high reclaim priorities for kswapd by forcing it to scan a
> minimum amount of pages when lru_pages >> priority yielded nothing.
> 
> b95a2f2d486d ("mm: vmscan: convert global reclaim to per-memcg LRU
> lists"), due to switching global reclaim to a round-robin scheme over
> all cgroups, had to restrict this forceful behavior to unreclaimable
> zones in order to prevent massive overreclaim with many cgroups.
> 
> The latter patch effectively neutered the behavior completely for all
> but extreme memory pressure. But in those situations we might as well
> drop the reclaimers to lower priority levels. Remove the check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 19 +++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 911957b66622..46b6223fe7f3 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2129,22 +2129,13 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  	int pass;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If the zone or memcg is small, nr[l] can be 0.  This
> -	 * results in no scanning on this priority and a potential
> -	 * priority drop.  Global direct reclaim can go to the next
> -	 * zone and tends to have no problems. Global kswapd is for
> -	 * zone balancing and it needs to scan a minimum amount. When
> +	 * If the zone or memcg is small, nr[l] can be 0. When
>  	 * reclaiming for a memcg, a priority drop can cause high
> -	 * latencies, so it's better to scan a minimum amount there as
> -	 * well.
> +	 * latencies, so it's better to scan a minimum amount. When a
> +	 * cgroup has already been deleted, scrape out the remaining
> +	 * cache forcefully to get rid of the lingering state.
>  	 */
> -	if (current_is_kswapd()) {
> -		if (!pgdat_reclaimable(pgdat))
> -			force_scan = true;
> -		if (!mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
> -			force_scan = true;
> -	}
> -	if (!global_reclaim(sc))
> +	if (!global_reclaim(sc) || !mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
>  		force_scan = true;
>  
>  	/* If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages. */
> -- 
> 2.11.1

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-01 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-28 21:39 [PATCH 0/9] mm: kswapd spinning on unreclaimable nodes - fixes and cleanups Johannes Weiner
2017-02-28 21:39 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: fix 100% CPU kswapd busyloop on unreclaimable nodes Johannes Weiner
2017-03-02  3:23   ` Hillf Danton
2017-03-02 23:30   ` Shakeel Butt
2017-03-03  1:26   ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-03  7:59     ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-06  1:37       ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-06 16:24         ` Johannes Weiner
2017-03-07  0:59           ` Hillf Danton
2017-03-07  7:28           ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-07 10:17           ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-07 16:56             ` Johannes Weiner
2017-03-09 14:20               ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-28 21:40 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: fix check for reclaimable pages in PF_MEMALLOC reclaim throttling Johannes Weiner
2017-03-01 15:02   ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02  3:25   ` Hillf Danton
2017-02-28 21:40 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: remove seemingly spurious reclaimability check from laptop_mode gating Johannes Weiner
2017-03-01 15:06   ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-01 15:17   ` Mel Gorman
2017-03-02  3:27   ` Hillf Danton
2017-02-28 21:40 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm: remove unnecessary reclaimability check from NUMA balancing target Johannes Weiner
2017-03-01 15:14   ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02  3:28   ` Hillf Danton
2017-02-28 21:40 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm: don't avoid high-priority reclaim on unreclaimable nodes Johannes Weiner
2017-03-01 15:21   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-03-02  3:31   ` Hillf Danton
2017-02-28 21:40 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm: don't avoid high-priority reclaim on memcg limit reclaim Johannes Weiner
2017-03-01 15:40   ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-01 17:36     ` Johannes Weiner
2017-03-01 19:13       ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02  3:32   ` Hillf Danton
2017-02-28 21:40 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm: delete NR_PAGES_SCANNED and pgdat_reclaimable() Johannes Weiner
2017-03-01 15:41   ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02  3:34   ` Hillf Danton
2017-02-28 21:40 ` [PATCH 8/9] Revert "mm, vmscan: account for skipped pages as a partial scan" Johannes Weiner
2017-03-01 15:51   ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02  3:36   ` Hillf Danton
2017-02-28 21:40 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm: remove unnecessary back-off function when retrying page reclaim Johannes Weiner
2017-03-01 14:56   ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02  3:37   ` Hillf Danton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170301152144.GE11730@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hejianet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).