From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752964AbdCAQpu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:45:50 -0500
Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:43376 "EHLO
        merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751647AbdCAQoq (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:44:46 -0500
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:22:18 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize pick_next_task for idle_sched_class too
Message-ID: <20170301162218.GQ6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20170119101703.2abeaeb6@gandalf.local.home>
 <20170119174408.GN6485@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAEU1=P=zZuYb-0W861Ek8wrqvZGfx1aVXC9_x4T8cyJptoPZWA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170223135458.GC6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAEU1=Pk=ZvePRg2pH34akgRjPHCeaKU66GUtw2Q65tOAx920ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170301105303.00773560@gandalf.local.home>
 <20170301160352.GO6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20170301111922.27700f17@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170301111922.27700f17@gandalf.local.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:19:22AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:03:52 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:53:03AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > Peter, do we have a solution for this yet? Are you going to add the one
> > > with the linker magic?  
> > 
> > I queued the below earlier today.
> 
> Isn't this pretty much identical to the patch I sent you a month ago?
> 
>   http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170119101703.2abeaeb6@gandalf.local.home

Yes, except this one has a comment explaining why we care about
prev->sched_class.