From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mike.leach@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] coresight: refactor with function of_coresight_get_cpu
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 08:39:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170302003919.GC1906@leoy-linaro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170301160233.GB4009@linaro.org>
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:02:33AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:06:59PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > This is refactor to add function of_coresight_get_cpu(), so it's used to
> > retrieve CPU id for coresight component. Finally can use it as a common
> > function for multiple places.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > include/linux/coresight.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> > index 629e031..2e7bbe2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> > @@ -101,14 +101,34 @@ static int of_coresight_alloc_memory(struct device *dev,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
> > +{
> > + int cpu;
> > + struct device_node *dn;
> > +
> > + dn = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpu", 0);
> > +
> > + /* Affinity defaults to CPU0 */
> > + if (!dn)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > + if (dn == of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL))
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + of_node_put(dn);
>
> In the case where no CPU nodes are found this function will return the number
> of the last CPU that was probed instead of '0'.
Sure, will fix this.
> > +
> > + return cpu;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_coresight_get_cpu);
>
> Any reason you exported this - the fact that is it declared in corsight.h should
> be enough.
Will remove it.
Thanks,
Leo Yan
> > +
> > struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> > struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> > {
> > - int i = 0, ret = 0, cpu;
> > + int i = 0, ret = 0;
> > struct coresight_platform_data *pdata;
> > struct of_endpoint endpoint, rendpoint;
> > struct device *rdev;
> > - struct device_node *dn;
> > struct device_node *ep = NULL;
> > struct device_node *rparent = NULL;
> > struct device_node *rport = NULL;
> > @@ -175,16 +195,7 @@ struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> > } while (ep);
> > }
> >
> > - /* Affinity defaults to CPU0 */
> > - pdata->cpu = 0;
> > - dn = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpu", 0);
> > - for (cpu = 0; dn && cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
> > - if (dn == of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL)) {
> > - pdata->cpu = cpu;
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - }
> > - of_node_put(dn);
> > + pdata->cpu = of_coresight_get_cpu(node);
> >
> > return pdata;
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/linux/coresight.h b/include/linux/coresight.h
> > index 2a5982c..6709561 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/coresight.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/coresight.h
> > @@ -263,11 +263,13 @@ static inline int coresight_timeout(void __iomem *addr, u32 offset,
> > #endif
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > +extern int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node);
> > extern struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> > struct device *dev, struct device_node *node);
> > #else
> > static inline struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> > struct device *dev, struct device_node *node) { return NULL; }
> > +static int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node) { return 0; }
> > #endif
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-28 15:06 [PATCH v2 0/3] coresight: enable debug module Leo Yan
2017-02-28 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] coresight: bindings for " Leo Yan
2017-03-01 15:45 ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-03-02 0:43 ` Leo Yan
2017-03-03 6:21 ` Rob Herring
2017-02-28 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] coresight: refactor with function of_coresight_get_cpu Leo Yan
2017-03-01 16:02 ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-03-02 0:39 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2017-02-28 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] coresight: add support for debug module Leo Yan
2017-03-01 17:35 ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-03-02 0:37 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170302003919.GC1906@leoy-linaro \
--to=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).