From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754999AbdCGIef (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2017 03:34:35 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:39845 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752260AbdCGIe1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2017 03:34:27 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:53:03 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: kernel test robot Cc: Ingo Molnar , kitsunyan , Chris Mason , Linus Torvalds , Mike Galbraith , Mike Galbraith , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Stephen Rothwell , lkp@01.org Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [sched/fair] 4c77b18cf8: hackbench.throughput -14.4% regression Message-ID: <20170307075303.GS6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <87lgsh3hbn.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lgsh3hbn.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:18:36AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -14.4% regression of hackbench.throughput due to commit: Yeah, I know ... this patch is a mixed bag, some like it, some hate it. But given it was fingered by a human doing desktopy things that trumps artificial benchmark. Still, I'll try and see if I can fix thing once I find a spare moment.