From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751247AbdCOAgt (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:36:49 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:58484 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750881AbdCOAgr (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:36:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20170314.173645.1126342566528886979.davem@davemloft.net> To: ddaney@caviumnetworks.com Cc: david.daney@cavium.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com, ast@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, steven.hill@cavium.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] MIPS: BPF: JIT fixes and improvements. From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1d09f001-aa15-e3bf-be85-a13b1132a12a@caviumnetworks.com> References: <20170314212144.29988-1-david.daney@cavium.com> <20170314.172937.1289357366273291363.davem@davemloft.net> <1d09f001-aa15-e3bf-be85-a13b1132a12a@caviumnetworks.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: David Daney Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:34:02 -0700 > On 03/14/2017 05:29 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: David Daney >> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:21:39 -0700 >> >>> Changes from v1: >>> >>> - Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE >>> >>> - Added three more patches for other problems found. >>> >>> >>> Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module >>> identified some failures and unimplemented features. >>> >>> With this patch set we get: >>> >>> test_bpf: Summary: 305 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [85/297 JIT'ed] >>> >>> Both big and little endian tested. >>> >>> We still lack eBPF support, but this is better than nothing. >> >> What tree are you targetting with these changes? Do you expect >> them to go via the MIPS or the net-next tree? >> >> Please be explicit about this in the future. >> > > Sorry I didn't mention it. > > My expectation is that Ralf would merge it via the MIPS tree, as it is > fully contained within arch/mips/* Great, thanks for letting me know.