linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	okash.khawaja@gmail.com, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Kirk Reiser <kirk@reisers.ca>,
	Chris Brannon <chris@the-brannons.com>,
	speakup@linux-speakup.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] staging: speakup: introduce tty-based comms
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 02:18:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170314011814.p3t4zfcx3cxhgvwl@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170314004701.kuecu2zu4md5ccrq@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr>

Samuel Thibault, on mar. 14 mars 2017 01:47:01 +0100, wrote:
> Greg KH, on mar. 14 mars 2017 06:14:04 +0800, wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:05:51PM +0000, okash.khawaja@gmail.com wrote:
> > > This patchset introduces a TTY-based way for the synths to communicate
> > > with devices as an alternate for direct serial comms used by the synths
> > > at the moment. It then migrates some of the synths to the TTY-based
> > > comms. Synths migrated in this patchset are dummy, acntsa, bns and
> > > txprt.
> > 
> > What about using the serbus code that is now in the tree?  That should
> > make this a lot easier than your patchset from what I can see.
> 
> Mmm... AIUI from reading tty_port_register_device_attr, one
> would have to have registered a speakup serdev device driver
> *before* tty_port_register_device_attr gets called, so that
> serdev_tty_port_register matches the driver in the loop of
> of_serdev_register_devices, and no TTY cdev is created?
> 
> That would mean that speakup can not be loaded as a module after ttyS0
> initialization, that won't fly for our use needs. The line discipline
> mechanism allows us to attach ourself to an existing tty.  Could we
> imagine a tty_port function which removes the cdev and tries to register
> the tty port again to serdev?
> 
> What we basically need to be able to say on speakup module load is
> e.g. "I'm now attaching a device to ttyS0, use this serdev_device_ops to
> discuss with it".

That for_each_available_child_of_node loop is really way more complex
than what we need.  And what's more, it's not working without CONFIG_OF
(!)

It would really make sense to me to have a

serdev_device *tty_port_register_serdev_device(tty, device)

which unregisters the character device of the tty, and creates instead a
controler with the given device plugged to it. Really much like a line
discipline, but way simpler :)

The issue that remains is the "tty" part: we'd need there the tty_port,
the parent device, the tty driver, the idx. All we know when we load
speakup is "ttyS0". That's where going through the cdev to attach a line
discipline was simpler :)

Samuel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-14  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-13 22:05 [patch 0/7] staging: speakup: introduce tty-based comms okash.khawaja
2017-03-13 22:05 ` [patch 1/7] tty_port: allow a port to be opened with a tty that has no file handle okash.khawaja
2017-03-13 22:12   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-03-13 22:38     ` Okash Khawaja
2017-03-14  9:14   ` Dan Carpenter
2017-03-13 22:05 ` [patch 2/7] staging: speakup: spk_serial_out and spk_wait_for_xmitr to take synth arg okash.khawaja
2017-03-13 22:05 ` [patch 3/7] staging: serial: add spk_io_ops struct to spk_synth okash.khawaja
2017-03-13 22:05 ` [patch 4/7] staging: speakup: move spk_stop_serial_interrupt into synth-specific release function okash.khawaja
2017-03-13 22:05 ` [patch 5/7] staging: speakup: move those functions which do outgoing serial comms, into serialio.c okash.khawaja
2017-03-13 22:05 ` [patch 6/7] staging: speakup: add tty-based comms functions okash.khawaja
2017-03-13 22:05 ` [patch 7/7] staging: speakup: migrate acntsa, bns, dummy and txprt to ttyio okash.khawaja
2017-03-13 22:14 ` [patch 0/7] staging: speakup: introduce tty-based comms Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-03-13 22:26   ` Samuel Thibault
2017-03-13 23:43     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-03-13 23:49       ` Samuel Thibault
2017-03-14  0:00     ` Samuel Thibault
2017-03-14  0:47   ` Samuel Thibault
2017-03-14  1:18     ` Samuel Thibault [this message]
2017-03-15 14:45       ` Rob Herring
2017-03-15 15:03         ` Samuel Thibault
2017-03-22  0:05           ` Samuel Thibault
2017-04-09 16:54             ` Okash Khawaja
2017-03-16  9:26     ` Samuel Thibault
2017-03-14  0:24 ` Samuel Thibault

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170314011814.p3t4zfcx3cxhgvwl@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr \
    --to=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
    --cc=chris@the-brannons.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.com \
    --cc=kirk@reisers.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okash.khawaja@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=speakup@linux-speakup.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).