linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:07:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170314150739.GD32474@worktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170314150241.GO5680@worktop>

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 04:02:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:30:11PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 
> > But. perf_event_init_task() adds child_event to parent_event->child_list.
> > 
> > If perf_event_release_kernel(parent_event) is called before copy_process()
> > does perf_event_free_task() which (in particular) removes it from child_list,
> > perf_event_release_kernel() can find this child_event and do get_ctx(ctx)
> > (under the list_for_each_entry(child, &event->child_list, child_list) loop).
> 
> Right; the child_list is the only thing that is exposed. And yes, it
> looks like that can interleave just right.
> 
> > Then it does put_ctx(ctx), but ctx->task can be already freed by
> > copy_process()->free_task() in this case.
> 
> 
> 	Task1				Task2
> 
> 	fork()
> 	  perf_event_init_task()
> 	  /* ... */
> 	  goto bad_fork_$foo;
> 	  /* ... */
> 	  perf_event_free_task()
> 	    mutex_lock(ctx->lock)
> 	    perf_free_event(B)
> 
> 					perf_event_release_kernel(A)
> 					  mutex_lock(A->child_mutex)
> 					  list_for_each_entry(child, ...) {
> 					    /* child == B */
> 					    ctx = B->ctx;
> 					    get_ctx(ctx);
> 					    mutex_unlock(A->child_mutex);
> 
> 	      mutex_lock(A->child_mutex)
> 	      list_del_init(B->child_list)
> 	      mutex_unlock(A->child_mutex)
> 
> 	      /* ... */
> 
> 	    mutex_unlock(ctx->lock);
> 	    put_ctx() /* >0 */
> 	  free_task();
> 					    mutex_lock(ctx->lock);
> 					    mutex_lock(A->child_mutex);
> 					    /* ... */
> 					    mutex_unlock(A->child_mutex);
> 					    mutex_unlock(ctx->lock)
> 					    put_ctx() /* 0 */
> 					      ctx->task && !TOMBSTONE
> 					        put_task_struct() /* UAF */
> 
> 
> Something like that, right?
> 
> 
> Let me see if it makes sense to retain perf_event_free_task() at all;
> maybe we should always do perf_event_exit_task().

Do we want a WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&tsk->usage)); in free_task()?
Because in the above scenario we're freeing it with references on.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-14 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-06  9:57 perf: use-after-free in perf_release Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 12:17   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 12:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 12:27       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 12:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 13:34   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-07  9:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-07  9:26       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-07  9:37         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-07  9:43           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-07 10:00             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-07 13:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-07 13:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-07 14:04   ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-07 14:17     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-07 16:51       ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-07 17:29         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 12:55         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 13:24           ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-14 13:47             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 14:03           ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-14 14:07             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 14:30               ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-14 15:02                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 15:07                   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-03-14 15:37                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-14 15:46                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 15:19                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-14 15:26                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 15:59                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-15 16:43                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-16 12:05                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 13:57                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 16:41                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-16 12:47 [PATCH 0/4] perf patches Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 12:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf: Fix use-after-free in perf_release() Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 15:19   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 12:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf: Fix event inheritance on fork() Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 15:19   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 12:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf: Simplify perf_event_free_task() Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 15:20   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 12:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: Better explain the inherit magic Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 15:21   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 13:20 ` [PATCH 0/4] perf patches Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170314150739.GD32474@worktop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).