From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
arjan@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
richard.weinberger@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: Implement __WARN using UD0
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:41:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170321154122.GT5680@worktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170321153252.ssmrumchartuvy5m@treble>
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:32:52AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:14:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > +static int fixup_bug(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (trapnr != X86_TRAP_UD)
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + switch (report_bug(regs->ip, regs)) {
> > > > + case BUG_TRAP_TYPE_NONE:
> > > > + case BUG_TRAP_TYPE_BUG:
> > > > + break;
> > > > +
> > > > + case BUG_TRAP_TYPE_WARN:
> > > > + regs->ip += 2;
> > > > + return 1;
> > >
> > > For self-documentation purposes, maybe use a define for the length of
> > > the ud0 instruction?
> >
> > Well, UD0 and UD2 really. LENGTH_UD0_OR_UD2 is a bit of a fail, name
> > wise.
>
> Why UD2? Warnings are UD0-only, no? What about UD0_LEN? Or at least a
> comment would be helpful I think.
Oh, right, we only resume on WARN,.. Doh.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-21 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-17 21:19 [PATCH 0/5] x86 optimizations Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-17 21:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: Implement __WARN using UD0 Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-21 14:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-21 15:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-21 15:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2017-03-21 15:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-21 15:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-03-22 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-22 14:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-17 21:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] bug: Add _ONCE logic to report_bug() Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-17 21:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] atomic: Introduce atomic_try_cmpxchg() Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-17 21:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] refcount: Use atomic_try_cmpxchg() Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-17 21:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86,atomic: Use atomic_try_cmpxchg Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170321154122.GT5680@worktop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).