From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752688AbdCWIMt (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 04:12:49 -0400 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]:58923 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751868AbdCWIMq (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 04:12:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:12:43 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Laurent Monat , thorsten.christiansson@idquantique.com, Enrico Jorns , Jason Roberts , Artem Bityutskiy , Dinh Nguyen , Marek Vasut , Brian Norris , Graham Moore , David Woodhouse , Masami Hiramatsu , Chuanxiao Dong , Jassi Brar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Richard Weinberger , Cyrille Pitchen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/53] mtd: nand: denali: fix bitflips calculation in handle_ecc() Message-ID: <20170323091243.52994427@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: References: <1490191680-14481-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <1490191680-14481-12-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <20170322215728.69e8b566@bbrezillon> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:02:02 +0900 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Boris, > > 2017-03-23 5:57 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon : > > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:07:18 +0900 > > Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > >> + do { > >> + err_addr = ioread32(denali->flash_reg + ECC_ERROR_ADDRESS); > >> + err_sector = ECC_SECTOR(err_addr); > >> + err_byte = ECC_BYTE(err_addr); > >> + > >> + err_cor_info = ioread32(denali->flash_reg + ERR_CORRECTION_INFO); > >> + err_cor_value = ECC_CORRECTION_VALUE(err_cor_info); > >> + err_device = ECC_ERR_DEVICE(err_cor_info); > >> + > >> + /* reset the bitflip counter when crossing ECC sector */ > >> + if (err_sector != prev_sector) > >> + bitflips = 0; > >> + > >> + if (ECC_ERROR_UNCORRECTABLE(err_cor_info)) { > >> + /* > >> + * if the error is not correctable, need to look at the > >> + * page to see if it is an erased page. if so, then > >> + * it's not a real ECC error > >> + */ > >> + ret = -EBADMSG; > > > > You should never return -EBADMSG directly. Just increment > > ecc_stats.failed and let the core return -EBADMSG to the upper layer. > > > > Here, -EBADMSG is used like that returned from ->ecc.correct() > > > Please notice denali_read_page() never returns -EBADMSG. > > -EBADMSG is used as a mark "we need erased page check". > > > I think nand_read_page_syndrome() does similar; > -EBADMSG is used internally. That's not exactly what happens. nand_read_page_syndrome() calls ecc->correct() for each chunk, and if this method returns -EBADMSG (and nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk() returns -EBADMSG too) it increments the ecc_stats.failed counter. Here you check all chunks in the same function and only increment ecc_stats.failed once in denali_read_page() even if several chunks are uncorrectable. You handle_ecc() should act like nand_read_page_syndrome() WRT ECC checking: check each block one by one, call nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk() if needed, increment ecc_stats.failed when an uncorrectable error is detected, and return max_bitflips at the end.