From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753820AbdC1Qxz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:53:55 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59539 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752077AbdC1Qxy (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:53:54 -0400
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:53:43 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,hugetlb: compute page_size_log properly
Message-ID: <20170328165343.GB27446@linux-80c1.suse>
Mail-Followup-To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com,
        ak@linux.intel.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
References: <1488992761-9464-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1488992761-9464-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Do we have any consensus here? Keeping SHM_HUGE_* is currently
winning 2-1. If there are in fact users out there computing the
value manually, then I am ok with keeping it and properly exporting
it. Michal?

Thanks,
Davidlohr