From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] stack tracing causes: kernel/module.c:271 module_assert_mutex_or_preempt
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:54:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170405145425.357937b8@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170405175925.GG1600@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:59:25 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Note, this has nothing to do with trace_rcu_dyntick(). It's the
> > function tracer tracing inside RCU, calling the stack tracer to record
> > a new stack if it sees its larger than any stack before. All I need is
> > a way to tell the stack tracer to not record a stack if it is in this
> > RCU critical section.
> >
> > If you can add a "in_rcu_critical_section()" function, that the stack
> > tracer can test, and simply exit out like it does if in_nmi() is set,
> > that would work too. Below is my current work around.
>
> Except that the rcu_irq_enter() would already have triggered the bug
> that was (allegedly) fixed by my earlier patch. So, yes, the check for
> rcu_is_watching() would work around this bug, but the hope is that
> with my earlier fix, this workaround would not be needed.
Note, if I had a "in_rcu_critical_section()" I wouldn't need to call
rcu_irq_enter(). I could fall out before that. My current workaround
does the check, even though it breaks things, it would hopefully fix
things as it calls rcu_irq_exit() immediately.
Would I would have is:
if (in_rcu_critical_section())
goto out;
rcu_irq_enter();
which would probably be the easiest fix.
>
> So could you please test my earlier patch?
I could, but it wouldn't tell me anything immediately. It's a hard race
to hit. Which I never could hit it when I tried, but it would appear to
hit immediately when testing other things :-p
Remember, it only triggers when a new max stack size is hit. The bug
happens when that new max stack size is in the rcu critical section.
I guess I could force it to trigger by inserting a call in your code
that clears the max stack size.
-- Steve
>
> This patch does not conflict with anything on -rcu, so you could
> carry it if that helps.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-05 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-05 13:32 [BUG] stack tracing causes: kernel/module.c:271 module_assert_mutex_or_preempt Steven Rostedt
2017-04-05 16:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-05 16:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-05 17:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-05 18:54 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2017-04-05 19:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-05 19:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-05 19:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-05 19:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-05 20:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-06 1:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-06 4:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-06 2:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-06 4:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-06 14:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-06 14:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170405145425.357937b8@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).