From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751949AbdDJCLL (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Apr 2017 22:11:11 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:34001 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751200AbdDJCLJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Apr 2017 22:11:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:11:07 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Lee Jones , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Message-ID: <20170410121107.69b83963@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <1491309075.708.125.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20170404164453.677dc74a@canb.auug.org.au> <20170404081937.npgk3cwx7bv5igzg@dell> <20170404082156.yhepja5bveahlegr@dell> <1491309075.708.125.camel@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.home.local id v3A2BF4b022210 Hi all, On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:31:15 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 09:21 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > > > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > > > > > > > /home/sfr/next/next/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c:25:31: > > > > fatal error: asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h: No such file or directory > > > > > > > > Caused by commit > > > > > > > >   eb2a445f7d8f ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Fix a mess with compilation > > > > units") > > > > > > > > I have reverted that commit for today. > > > > > > Andy, > > > > > > I'm pulling this commit.  Despite you thinking the error is unrelated > > > to your patch, something is clearly wrong and I don't have time to > > > investigate. > > > > > > Ball is in your court. > > > > Okay, I've had a *very* quick looks. > > > Seems as if you should be depending on INTEL_PMC_IPC. > > As a quick fix, yes. As a proper fix the PMC/SCU mess should be fixed in > a way to provide a header in include/platform_data/x86. > > I will prepare v4. > Thanks. Ping? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell