On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 05:36:25PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Wei Yang wrote:
>
>> By emulating numa, it may contains more or less nodes than physical nodes.
>> In numa_emulation(), numa_meminfo/numa_distance/__apicid_to_node is
>> restructured according to emulated nodes, except numa_nodes_parsed.
>> 
>> This patch restructures numa_nodes_parsed from emulated nodes.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>
>Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>
>although there's a small nit: NODE_MASK_NONE is only used for 
>initialization, this should be nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed) instead, but 
>that would be up to the x86 maintainers to allow it.
>

Thanks for pointing out :-)

I would pay attention to this next time.

>> ---
>>  arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
>> index a6d01931b9a1..14f075fc4cc5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
>> @@ -391,6 +391,13 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo, int numa_dist_cnt)
>>  	/* commit */
>>  	*numa_meminfo = ei;
>>  
>> +	/* Make sure numa_nodes_parsed only contains emulated nodes */
>> +	numa_nodes_parsed = NODE_MASK_NONE;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ei.blk); i++)
>> +		if (ei.blk[i].start != ei.blk[i].end &&
>> +		    ei.blk[i].nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> +			node_set(ei.blk[i].nid, numa_nodes_parsed);
>> +
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Transform __apicid_to_node table to use emulated nids by
>>  	 * reverse-mapping phys_nid.  The maps should always exist but fall

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me