From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753546AbdDKVTs (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:19:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:35179 "EHLO mail-wm0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752982AbdDKVTo (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:19:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:19:36 +0200 From: Daniel Lezcano To: Lee Jones Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, xuwei5@hisilicon.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] clk: hi6220: Add the hi655x's pmic clock Message-ID: <20170411211936.GT2078@mai> References: <1491683412-12237-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <20170411140613.jvhzsvrxa4evwxjh@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20170411140613.jvhzsvrxa4evwxjh@dell> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:06:13PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Sat, 08 Apr 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > > The hi655x multi function device is a PMIC providing regulators. > > > > The PMIC also provides a clock for the WiFi and the Bluetooth, let's implement > > this clock in order to add it in the hi655x MFD and allow proper wireless > > initialization. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > > --- > > > > Changelog: > > > > V2: > > - Added COMPILE_TEST option, compiled on x86 > > - Removed useless parenthesis > > - Used of_clk_hw_simple_get() instead of deref dance > > - Do bailout if the clock-names is not specified > > - Rollback on error > > - Folded mfd line change and binding > > Why did you do that? I thought as the V1 had comments you would have waited for the V2 and as it was trivial enough, it could be folded and picked up via the clk tree via with your acked-by. I realize it was not a good idea. Do you want to drop it from your tree or shall I resubmit a V3 without the mfd change? -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog