From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>,
Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org,
Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 05/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get register offsets
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:28:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170412162850.huhhn6xfwls3qex6@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170308003254.27833-6-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:32:38PM -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> The function insn_get_reg_offset takes as argument an enumeration that
Please end function names with parentheses.
And do you mean get_reg_offset(), per chance?
> indicates the type of offset that is returned: the R/M part of the ModRM
> byte, the index of the SIB byte or the base of the SIB byte.
Err, you mean, it returns the offset to the register the argument
specifies.
> Callers of
> this function would need the definition of such enumeration. This is not
> needed. Instead, helper functions can be defined for this purpose can be
> added.
"Instead, add helpers... "
> These functions are useful in cases when, for instance, the caller
> needs to decide whether the operand is a register or a memory location by
> looking at the mod part of the ModRM byte.
>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
> Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h | 3 +++
> arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h
> index 5cab1b1..754211b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h
> @@ -12,5 +12,8 @@
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>
> void __user *insn_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +int insn_get_reg_offset_modrm_rm(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +int insn_get_reg_offset_sib_base(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +int insn_get_reg_offset_sib_base(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs);
Forgotten to edit the copy-paste?
Which means, nothing really needs insn_get_reg_offset_sib_index() and
you can get rid of it?
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_INSN_EVAL_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> index 23cf010..78df1c9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,57 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
> return regoff[regno];
> }
>
> +/**
> + * insn_get_reg_offset_modrm_rm - Obtain register in r/m part of ModRM byte
> + * @insn: Instruction structure containing the ModRM byte
> + * @regs: Set of registers indicated by the ModRM byte
That's simply struct pt_regs - not a set of registers indicated by
ModRM?!?
> + * Obtain the register indicated by the r/m part of the ModRM byte. The
> + * register is obtained as an offset from the base of pt_regs. In specific
> + * cases, the returned value can be -EDOM to indicate that the particular value
> + * of ModRM does not refer to a register.
Put that sentence under the "Return: " paragraph below so that it is
immediately obvious what the retvals are.
> + *
> + * Return: Register indicated by r/m, as an offset within struct pt_regs
> + */
> +int insn_get_reg_offset_modrm_rm(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
That name is too long: insn_get_modrm_rm_off() should be enough.
> +{
> + return get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * insn_get_reg_offset_sib_base - Obtain register in base part of SiB byte
> + * @insn: Instruction structure containing the SiB byte
> + * @regs: Set of registers indicated by the SiB byte
> + *
> + * Obtain the register indicated by the base part of the SiB byte. The
> + * register is obtained as an offset from the base of pt_regs. In specific
> + * cases, the returned value can be -EDOM to indicate that the particular value
> + * of SiB does not refer to a register.
> + *
> + * Return: Register indicated by SiB's base, as an offset within struct pt_regs
Let's stick to a single spelling: SIB, all caps.
> + */
> +int insn_get_reg_offset_sib_base(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
insn_get_sib_base_off()
Ditto for the rest of the comments on insn_get_reg_offset_modrm_rm() above.
> +{
> + return get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_BASE);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * insn_get_reg_offset_sib_index - Obtain register in index part of SiB byte
> + * @insn: Instruction structure containing the SiB byte
> + * @regs: Set of registers indicated by the SiB byte
> + *
> + * Obtain the register indicated by the index part of the SiB byte. The
> + * register is obtained as an offset from the index of pt_regs. In specific
> + * cases, the returned value can be -EDOM to indicate that the particular value
> + * of SiB does not refer to a register.
> + *
> + * Return: Register indicated by SiB's base, as an offset within struct pt_regs
> + */
> +int insn_get_reg_offset_sib_index(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
insn_get_sib_idx_off()
And again, if this function is unused, don't add it.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-12 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 0:32 [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 01/21] x86/mpx: Use signed variables to compute effective addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-04-11 21:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-26 1:40 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 02/21] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB index if index points to R/ESP Ricardo Neri
2017-04-11 11:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-26 1:39 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 03/21] x86/mpx: Do not use R/EBP as base in the SIB byte with Mod = 0 Ricardo Neri
2017-04-11 22:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-26 2:04 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-04-26 8:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-27 22:49 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 04/21] x86/mpx, x86/insn: Relocate insn util functions to a new insn-kernel Ricardo Neri
2017-04-12 10:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-26 2:05 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 05/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get register offsets Ricardo Neri
2017-04-12 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-04-26 18:13 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-04-28 10:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 06/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector Ricardo Neri
2017-04-18 9:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-26 20:44 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-04-26 20:47 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-04-30 17:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 18:31 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 07/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor Ricardo Neri
2017-04-19 10:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-26 21:51 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-04 11:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-12 2:13 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-15 17:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 08/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor base address Ricardo Neri
2017-04-20 8:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-26 22:37 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 17:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-12 2:09 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-04-26 22:52 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 17:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-12 2:06 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 09/21] x86/insn-eval: Add functions to get default operand and address sizes Ricardo Neri
2017-04-20 13:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-27 1:07 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 10/21] x86/insn-eval: Do not use R/EBP as base if mod in ModRM is zero Ricardo Neri
2017-04-21 10:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-27 1:29 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-07 17:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-12 1:57 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 11/21] insn/eval: Incorporate segment base in address computation Ricardo Neri
2017-04-21 14:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-27 1:31 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 12/21] x86/insn: Support both signed 32-bit and 64-bit effective addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-04-25 13:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-27 3:33 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-08 11:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-12 1:55 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 13/21] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 16-bit addressing encodings Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 14/21] x86/insn-eval: Add wrapper function for 16-bit and 32-bit address encodings Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 15/21] x86/mm: Relocate page fault error codes to traps.h Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 16:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 16/21] x86/cpufeature: Add User-Mode Instruction Prevention definitions Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 17/21] x86: Add emulation code for UMIP instructions Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 18/21] x86/umip: Force a page fault when unable to copy emulated result to user Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 19/21] x86/traps: Fixup general protection faults caused by UMIP Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 15:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 20/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 0:32 ` [v6 PATCH 21/21] selftests/x86: Add tests for " Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 15:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-10 23:38 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 14:08 ` [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable " Stas Sergeev
2017-03-08 16:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-08 16:29 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-08 16:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-08 16:53 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-09 1:11 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-09 22:05 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-10 2:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-10 10:30 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-10 21:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-10 21:37 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-09 1:15 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-09 22:10 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-10 2:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-10 11:33 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-10 14:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-11 1:22 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-10 23:59 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-13 21:25 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-27 23:46 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-28 9:38 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-29 4:38 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-29 20:55 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-30 5:14 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-30 10:10 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-31 1:33 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-31 14:11 ` Alexandre Julliard
2017-03-31 21:26 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-04-01 2:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-04-04 2:02 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-04-04 6:08 ` Alexandre Julliard
2017-04-01 13:08 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-04-01 17:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-04-02 15:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-04-04 9:59 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-04-04 2:05 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-04-04 8:03 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-10 23:58 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-09 0:46 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-09 22:01 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-10 23:47 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-10 23:58 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-03-11 0:13 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-03-08 16:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170412162850.huhhn6xfwls3qex6@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adam.buchbinder@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=julliard@winehq.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=stsp@list.ru \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wine-devel@winehq.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).